Yet you feel a mother still have the right to murder this human.
I do understand this. But you will find when atheists start talking about abortion they almost never refer to this unborn child as a baby or as n human child. Why? Because it is immoral to murder a human child so you have to de-humanize this human child to a bunch of cells. Somehow you need to justify this genocide.
The worst thing I can think of is when a mother murders her child. But morally it is ok for an atheist. Only an animal kills their babies. Then again according to your (atheist) we are just animals.
You will recognize that I do not distinguish between an unborn child and a living child. For me there is no difference.
Your (atheist) morals have changed so match that it is ok for a mother to kill her child.
What is next? Discriminating against those that is less intelligent. Killing the terminally sick. The execution off any criminal. Killing of orphans and AIDS babies . You can expect anything from a society when they are able to kill there unborn in the name of comfort.
Minister Joe Wright: Ã¢â‚¬Å“We have killed our unborn and called it choice.Ã¢â‚¬Â
Crous, thank you for being such a strong voice standing up for the innocent! Amen to your post.
It's interesting that a man who murders a pregnant woman can be charged for double murder. Yet a woman and a doctor who work together to murder her own unborn child? It becomes a legal and acceptable "procedure".
They call it choice - when one must ask, what choice is it? The choice to kill? So it is now a woman's right to murder her own child? What choice does the baby have? The baby has no voice with which to defend her/himself, no ability to escape and hide, no trial before being put on the worst kind of death row. The murder these children are subjected to defies belief. Even a criminal on death row who has committed a grevious crime has a more humane death.
The unborn child has committed no crime and is innocent, yet is subjected to the most henious act imaginable. The jewish holocaust does not even come close to the unborn holocaust, yet it's treated as "normal". Or "an option" and made legal. I've seen people stand up for animal rights, unbelievers/believers alike, are completely indifferent to the rights of the unborn human child. SAVE THE WHALE, but stuff the unborn child. I've had people get angry at me for ever putting anything up on my facebook page that supports the protection of unborn children, yet praise me if I ever put up anything supporting the rights and protection of animals.
The unborn child is an individual. She/he is human, she/he has a gender. The unborn child is not a mole, a wart, or a tumour, yet it is treated as though he/she is as soon as she/he becomes an inconvenience. Then that little person becomes, disposable (at least in some people's eyes).
It's a woman's right ? If we are to be consistent, it should then be a woman's right to murder her child at any point during the child''s early years. If she feels the child is not wanted anymore, causing a financial burden, or is a source of grief (memories etc), then surely it is her right to kill that child? It's hers afterall and who has the right to interfere? Afterall, if we're to be consistent, it's anybody's right to kill their children at any point in time and it's actually safer to kill a child out of the womb than inside the womb where the mother can herself be maimed/damaged in some way. Yet somehow we recognise it as murder and wrong when it comes to a child out of the womb (apart from those who support partial birth abortion). But if the child is hidden inside the womb, it's no longer murder (unless it's a pregnant mother killed by somebody).
Just because a dreadful crime becomes "legal", does not make it right. Just as if they legalised peodophilia. Would that then make it acceptable behaviour? Of course not. So how on earth can murdering an unborn child be considered acceptable behaviour under any circumstances?
Problem is, those that are for abortion will ALWAYS use the most extreme circumstances as their reason for supporting abortion. They will frequently attempt to use the guilt trip resonse of "incest/rape/risk to mother if she has the child" etc. This is what they will do to attempt to make the pro-lifers feel somehow guilty about supporting the life of unborn children. But you must ask them, why not then abort the rapist? Why is the unborn child the one to be murdered for a crime it did not commit? How does commiting murder on an unborn child a lesser crime than the rape/incest and how does this help anybody by matching one crime with another that is as bad, if not worse. If the Mother is in danger from a dodgy pregnancy, the baby is also in danger of being deliberatey murdered. I have heard of pregnant mothers being told they should not go through with the pregancy and should abort because of the risk, wind up going through with it and both Mum and baby surviing fine and the Mum being horrified at how close she was to having the child aborted. Such mother preferred to risk themselves than deliberately kill their unborn baby.
The thing is, most abortions are not occuring because of the above extreme circumstances anyway. Most are done out of unwanted/inconvenient pregnancies. Either way, killing an innocent child should not be justifiable under any circumstances. Once we allowed such a vile foot in the door, the flood gates open and we have yet another holocaust on our hands that shows a barbaric and sinful society who murders its own children and calls it "choice".
Of course, they will also claim that if we don't do this, we will have backstreet abortions. We cannot stop people commiting such crimes, because they will happen. But to legalise such an act, just to make it "cleaner" and "safer" for the Mother, makes us as a society (who support this) part of this murderous act and has also increased the murders to an extreme, because it's so much easier now to "get rid of" the child. It does not change the seriousness of the crime, but rather makes criminals out of many more people (doctors included). I have also heard that there is a deliberate exaggeration of these apparent "backstreet" abortions, that are not as frequent as we have been lead to believe. But those who are attempting to promote abortions (financial motivation), which would not surprise me. Since planned parenthood are known to do whatever it takes to get more abortions! Ex abortionists have also made statements as to what they were told to say and do to gain as many abortions as possible and not let on how human the child really is. Some thankfully got out of it, after they could no longer stand to be a part of mutiliating/murdering innocent babies and then having to put the pieces back together (like a jigsaw) of the once complete baby to ensure that no parts were left inside the Mother. The humanity of the child is in no doubt, but it must become that much more evident and in your face as one pieces together the tiny limbs/fingers/toes etc.