Jump to content


Evolution Of H*m*s*xuality

  • Please log in to reply
81 replies to this topic

#81 performedge


    Don - a Child of the King

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 400 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Carolina
  • Interests:Being a logician. Debating the origins controversy. Going to heaven. Taking others with me. Seeing the creator.
  • Age: 48
  • Christian
  • Young Earth Creationist
  • Rock Hill, SC

Posted 12 March 2008 - 05:49 AM

performedge, the reason why heterosexuality is patently obvious as the real purpose of our S@xual organs is first theological and second scientific.  There's no real benefit either way.

View Post

Yes, I agree with you about H*m*s*xuality not being according to God's will or according to our physical design. But how about heterosexuality as well? God only condones heterosexuality with one man and one woman. Monogamy in the confines of marriage. Since the S@xual revolution in the 60's, our churches have begun to close a blind eye to heterosexual activity outside of marriage. It was just announced today that 25% of teenage women have STDs. And those figures do not include HIV, gonorrhea, or syphilis. What a tragedy.

The "girls gone wild" phrase is literally true. (Not blaming just women) Men have gone wild too. So heterosexuality outside of marriage is also patently obvious as against the real purpose of our S@xual organs as identified by science, not just the Bible. So the truth is that H*m*s*xuality has been around since Genesis and concubines have been around since Genesis. Both are against God's will, and science demonstrates that the negatives of both activities are very high.

#82 Guest_Markster106_*

  • Guests

Posted 22 March 2008 - 05:16 PM

Evolution doesn't necessarily have to be part of genes, it could have resulted from a mutation or something going wrong in the womb with hormones and what not.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users