My mistake, I said amber when I should have said pollen.
So apparently you donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t believe pollen ever existed in the past? The reason I ask this facetiously is because pollen fossils are very rare, even in Tertiary strata where they are expected. So by your logic, pollen doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t exist!
I cannot vouch for the abundance of pollen fond in various strata, but IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll make this observation:
Flowering plants are first found in the Jurassic and Conifers/pine in the Carboniferous (from memory), if the pollen is found in earlier strata that would be a problem. And by found in earier strat I mean in a strat that is well too early to have had such organisms in it, not just a little Ã¢â‚¬Ëœstratigraphic-range extensionÃ¢â‚¬â„¢.
Here are plenty of examples of out-of-place fossils, some of which include plant fossils:
Note also in the 1999 CRSQ article I cited earlier that there are more recent examples.
There appears no way to confirm the out of place fossil claim from your link, I get to the article by John Woodmorappe (March, 1982) which provides a list!
However from the article:
References 70, 17, 72, 82, 84, 89, 96, 147, 148, 153, and 160 are "downwash," "infiltration," or supposed "contamination.
Contaminated and reburied fossils donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t count as out of place.
Most other entries are .,reworking" of fossils into younger-age beds
Then we can discount these also, an out of place fossil must be in it original deposition layer, not in a reburied site. Professional palaeontologist can read the rocks and determine this.
A few of the entries in this table are claimed by the cited authors to be possible stratigraphic-range extensions
Stratigraphic-range extension does not qualify as out of place as I have demonstrated numerous times.