This pdf looks promising.
In fact, it's already profitable.
Examples of this sort, together with the unsuccessful attempts to discover any motion of the earth relatively to the Ã¢â‚¬Å“light medium,Ã¢â‚¬Â suggest that the phenomena of electrodynamics as well as of mechanics possess no properties corresponding to the idea of absolute rest. They suggest rather that, as has already been shown to the first order of small quantities, the same laws of electrodynamics and optics will be valid for all frames of reference for which the equations of mechanics hold good.1
So the objection that SR does not apply to (essentially all observations which demonstrate it to be false) is utterly without merit. Einstein himself, when laying it out, claims it applies to all
frames of reference for which the equations of mechanics hold.
There is one very, very large set of observations which have customarily been dismissed on the grounds that SR doesn't apply to them. It is admitted by all I've ever seen that if SR did apply, it'd be falsified. Haven't decided yet if I need to start one more thread or maybe two or three.
Quickly, I'll state what's required in order for them to weasel out: a statement from a contributing supporter of SR explaining that it doesn't apply to certain frames-of-reference dated prior to the discovery of the situations which falsify SR. Einstein might plausibly have changed his mind, or someone else could plausibly be said to have "figured out" an important implication.
On the other hand, if it be as history has indicated to me thus far, and this spurious ad hoc nonsense arose simply as a means of saying "we're gonna believe it no matter what", it is as bogus as it can get. I hope nobody will be insulted that I take the time to explain stuff like this which I really
shouldn't have to explain to intelligent, honest people.