Cal, there is a difference between sincerely telling people about Hell out of love and compassion for them, and using it as a debate tactic to try and scare people. The manner in which you tell people about facing God's judgement and going to Hell is reminiscent of the latter, not the former. In my experience you only bring up hell fire after an exchange with another poster in which there is a disagreement and, IMHO, when you don't seem to have good response.
What I mean is, when you seem to believe you can take your opponent down with facts, logic, and reason you don't seem to invoke hell fire all that much, but when you are pushed into a corner I see it a lot. I have debated dozens of creationists before, and in my experience when they start talking about hell fire my first reaction is that I won the exchange because I assume they have no substance left.
You give a negative response when you wish also. I have asked you several questions by name and you choose to ignore my questions. And yet you have the audacity to attack someone else? Get real.
You do the same thing! You need to take the beam out of your own eye! Practice what you preach! When you don't feel you want to anwer , uou choose to not respond.
Do you really think ignoring another being asking you a direct question is not hostile?
It's called being passive agressive!