I see you are still missing the point(or purposefully avoiding it). I'm not saying God didn't breath the "breath of life" into man (so quit equivocating to avoid the truth).
I'm not saying that you say that God didn't breathe the breath of life into man. In fact I think you were the one to quote that from the Bible.
But, He (God) clearly did so after He created man in His Image! "the LORD God formed <or constructed> the man from the dust of the ground and <or then> breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being". Gen 2:7
What does it mean when God said that He created man in His image?
My question/argument is that because of standard Christian doctrine that God is incorporeal and from John 4:24 and Luke 24:39 which supports that notion, how can we have been formed in the physical image of God? So I say that we are not in the physical image of God, but are formed in the spiritual image of God which is expressed when we do acts of love and kindness. Especially when there is no benefit for us; altruism. But because we are human (or fallen) we don't express perfect love all the time like God does.
It is you sir, who are avoiding, and equivocating (Which is a violation of the forum rules).
How am I equivocating? Is it because the original Torah was written in Hebrew, and you can translate it several different ways. So when you look at the word used in Hebrew for spirit it is often translated as breath or wind instead. So when the Bible says 'breath of life', it may be translated as 'spirit of life'. While I find this fact interesting and supportive of my interpretation, it is not my main focal point of my interpretation because I don't know Hebrew or their culture in detail.
Then you are attempting to paint me as using "ad hominem" attacks, simply because you don't like my calling you on your misunderstandings (or determined and intended misdirections)...
You have yet to respond to John 4:24 and Luke 24:39 or the Hebrew word for spirit/breath that I brought up. When I ask for your response you claim that I don't have a valid response than I "immaturely claimed some sort of victory." I'm not claiming any victory, just asking questions about the validity of the interpretation of 'we are created in the physical image of God'. If you don't have a refutation to my points that's fine, maybe someone else does. And if not, I still respect your right to believe that we are created in the physical image of God, that is just not my belief.
I have not done One liner negatives SIR
"In one word? No!"