Ah, finally. Lost this thread in the mix. Is there any way to tag threads so you can remember to come back and answer questions?
No Arch, at a creationist site, that is already assumed. Plus, the evidence here has been posited over and over again.
So what you're saying is that you have posted this evidence before? Great! Because that's what I'm saying too. You've posted evidence, and I post evidence. We both post evidence. What's the problem?
And when I go to atheistic sites, I know I have to have a proposal of evidence to counter their opinion because of their bias and preconceived religious stances. I cannot go there and say Ã¢â‚¬Å“you are all nutsÃ¢â‚¬Â!!!
Of course not, that would just be rude
But once you've posted some evidence, they'll try and contradict it with their evidence. You see, again, both parties post evidence.
Where you are missing the boat, is the fact that you came here to refute what is already the view. You have to make your case against the case that is already here.
No I get that. What you don't get is that for me to know what your view is you have to post stuff too. So again, we both post evidence. Really not a hard concept
If thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the case, show these purported Ã¢â‚¬Å“stacks upon stacks of evidenceÃ¢â‚¬Â instead of equivocating, quibbling and praying they exist. Quit with the smoke and mirrors and produce some tangible and empirical evidence, and not just more hot air.
I already did Dee, but since you asked so nicely (
) I'll post some additional resources.Talk Origins: 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution
I know how much you hate Talk Origins, but it really is the best compiled version of evidence I can find. I could link you heaps of sites that give you one or two reasons, or I can link you one that gives heaps. I went with the one that requires less bandwidth
Now, the point I'm making here has nothing
to do with whether you agree with these examples. The point I'm making is that there is supporting evidence for macro evolution. You can feel free to interpret it differently, but to completely deny this evidence exists is terribly dishonest to those that have just started looking into this topic.