Modern theory of evolution is a fairytale.
IMO a critical examination of the evidence and the objections to evolution will prove othetrwise, indeed that is what this forum examines.
Two mechanics responsible for the sustenance and creation of life. Mathematics refutes the current mechanism known as Random Mutation and as far as NS goes, well itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s not a universal force for starters. (Explanation available on request).
I presume you mean two mechanisms. I have seen some of the refutations of which you speak, and when examined in detail are full of bad assumptions, yet to see one that holds up to critical analysis. But if you feel there is a new argument by all means lets discuss and analysis the calculation/assumptions.
You have the ability to adapt. Where does this ability stem from ? Life cannot exist unless the configurations were correct in the first place.
Adaptation by an individual is limited to whatever starting configuration it was born with, e.g. a certain tolerance to hot and cold, within those limits the individual can function, and outside the limits it will die. This ability is determined by itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s DNA. Adaptation of a species to hot and cold, is determined by the environment <insert standard evolution model>, this processes is determined by the combination
As you say life cannot exist if the configurations were not correct, but just how correct do they have to be
, and how fast can a species reproduce determines who will adapt. E.g. if the natural temperature fluctuations were say 10 deg C at night and 25 in the day, then a great deal of life could withstand this, change the fluctuation too quickly to Ã¢â‚¬â€œ15 to +5 and I would expect a large amount of extinction. If this new condition remained, life would bounce back somewhat.
Furthermore, could you tell me where in the timeline of life, the theory of evolution was instigated ? At the first cell ? The Big Bang ? Abiogenesis ?
Biological evolution starts after abiogenesis. One should note that the word evolution can be used in different contexts so itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s quite possible to talk about stellar evolution. Combining this into a time line would give something like this:
Big bang Ã¢â‚¬â€œ formation of universe Ã¢â‚¬â€œ formation of solar system Ã¢â‚¬â€œ cooling of the earth Ã¢â‚¬â€œ chemical reactions Ã¢â‚¬â€œ replicating molecules (abiogenesis) (evolution starts) - simple life (as we recognise it now) Ã¢â‚¬â€œ complex life.
PS : Adaptation and Evolution are very different things
Well thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s my take from the POV of evolution. Do you agree or disagree with that interpretation, re adaptation/evolution?