Which brings me back to the question, What would you accept as an answer to the OP?Ã‚Â Give us an example.
IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m waiting on an answer the gives a solid foundation to the atheistÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s proof of our origins.
1- We know for a fact, using the empirical scientific method, that we have (and have had) existence.
2- Because we are here, we know we came from someone or somewhere because there is absolutely no evidence of something coming from nothing or no one.
IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll accept any cogent, logical and/or empirical evidences that answer:
1-From where did we come (what are our Origins)?
2-What are the atheistic foundations to support the atheistic worldview and philosophy of our origins?
So far, all we have heard is a priori (and unsupported) opinions and faith statements by atheists. Which are all fine, but; they donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t even come close to answering the OP.
If I opened a thread that asked for atheists unsupported opinions on our origins, I could then take the vast majority of the atheists posts form here and past them there, and that would be that.
Are you, or are you not, claiming that God exists?
Is that a part of the OP question then Jason? Are you, or are you not, attempting to sidetrack from the issue due to a lack of a cogent answer?
If we want to talk about the existence of God, open a thread for that question, and quit you attempt at side tracking this one due to your lack of an answer.