Still, none-the-less, you have not negated the hypothetical presuppositions built into your post; nor have you refuted anything IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve said. None of this buys your hypothesis any currency in reality.
I'm not talking about tree rings, using that as a hypothetical example.
Plus, there is NO observable annual process, which goes beyond recorded history, and renders the Ã¢â‚¬Å“definiteÃ¢â‚¬Â observable evidence you are wanting without presupposition.
What if we had an annual process that could be physically counted to 30,000 years?
But you donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t. You only have your presuppositions to go by. The moment you finally admit that, is the moment you can progress honestly.