Physics hates evolution ??????
Laws of Thermodynamics... (Physics hates evolution)
Duane Gish began every public debate with a speech on the Second Law of Thermodynamics. But for some reason, he never discussed the matter with qualified scientists. In 1989, Frederick Edwords, editor of the journal Creation/Evolution, sent Gish a letter inviting him to write a scholarly article explaining just where mainstream scientists have gone wrong in interpreting that law.
Edwords never got a response.
Well physics is incapable of hating anything. However, both physics and chemistry alone do not explain the origins of genetic codes DNA
which are esential to all life beginning in the first place and continuing on. How do nothing more than Physics and Chemistry produce just one code of brilliant purpose driven information ???????
Chemical Creation of life... (it doesn't happen so Chemistry hates Evolution)
Evolutionary theory does not address the question of how life originated. It only addresses the question of how life changed once it originated.
Evolutionists have explained that to Duane Gish dozens of times, but it goes in one ear and out the other.
Mutations that do good???... (Biology hates evolution)
Whether a mutation is beneficial or harmful depends on circumstances.
There is the case of the [i]Flavobacterium[/o], which feeds from nylon by-products. Suppose that an organism with a craving for nylon by-products were born before nylon were invented. Or suppose that such an organism were born in an isolated area where modern Technology had not been introduced. In such a case, the mutation would not be favorable and a new species would not likely arise.
I'm lumping both of these statements together. Again, Chemistry is incapable of hating anything, see above explanation about codes.
On the second statement, the more properly phrazed question should be "Do Random Mutations (undirected copying errors)
do any good ?"
Well here's an illustration of an actual intelligent sentence, yours.
( " Evolutionary theory does not address the question of how life originated " )
Well, there is your sentence, so what is missing ? Okay, I left off the period. Run this sentence through a properly programmed random mutation generator and see what happens. Now remember, the program has to be truly random, no fair cheating by using intelligent design rigging. Mostly the sentence will not stay intact and in actual fact the original content will not be improved, but only butchered. However, on the very slimmest of slim chances the body informational content sentence does stay intact and a period is added, then that is the extent of any type of benefit that was given as nothing more than punctuation. Nothing of the original content was changed or any further beneficial content was added.
The real mechanisms for adaptation and beneficial change for survival, Algorithmic engineering genes coupled with error correction mechanisms of Redundancy are often hijacked by evolutionists to claim it is their own when in FACT it isn't because the system is purpose driven and evolution has no purpose with intent driving for it's pure unadulterated mechanisms.
brought up the Miller-Urey
origin of life experiments and these in no way explain where the origin of the informational codes for furtherance and continued existance of life came from. In their (Miller, Urey & others) atheistic worldview, life is a bottom up phenomena involving material substrate which is an actual lie. Evolution is dependent on replication in order to function. DNA
has the information for replication and without it, no amount of chemicals and physics is going to produce life even if everything in the experiment is lucky to have all the right componants for manufacture of a single cell. Life is a purpose and directed phenomena and that orignates from a mind. At best, does this not prove that all those experiments ever prove is that it takes an actual intelligence (at least a scientist/s conducting the experiment) to manipulate the elements into their proper places ?????
Defies Bible and other Religious Texts (Religion hates evolution)
I pass on this one, because I never stipulated that religion was a valid frame of reference.
But it does have a valid frame of reference in the context of accountability and morality which cannot be separated from the natural world. Our natural world is in the toilette because the people who take the lead in a failed custodialship attempt at running our planet. All of these leaders have prided themselves on acquiring initials before and after their names for the purpose of social standing prominence and profiteering. It's not the rule with all, but it is the driving force of why our planet is failing environmentally. (BTW - Environmentalists don't have the answers either)
Dr, Prof, Phds, BS, MS, CEOs, CFOs, Pres, Sen, Cong, Gen, Sgt, Capt, Lt, etc, etc, etc, and I'll even through in alot of Rev, Past, Priest, Rabbi, Mullah, Imam, Monk, Shamin, etc because many through the ages have been found deficient for the very same reasons mentioned above.
Has barely any evidence and cannot repeat experiments to prove itself....
(Science hates Evolution!!!)
Green and black caterpillars have been made to evolve in the laboratory.
Okay I had to break this up because this comment doesn't even remotely make sense. In fact I tried to Google you sentence to understand what you were talking about and only two references came up and neither had anything to do with that statement. Catipillars don't evolve, the have encoded into their genetic DNA
brilliant instructions for a process called metamorphosis. One of the most important questions that should be looked at in studying any componant of the natural world is, "What is the function and purpose of the caterpillar and later adult butterfly state in any environment ?" In the caterpillar state the creature's main diet is mostly plants which we call ruderals (weeds fall into category)
, but also some specific plants and trees. Most all ruderals
are encoded with instructions geared towards prolithic replication of themselves to make more of their kind. Their only purpose is to quickly cover bare soil. Mankind in ignorance, stupidity, selfishness and greed have greatly fascillitated this. Caterpillars attacks weeds and keep things in check. Some of this creatures are host specific and look for a particular plant, much like the Monarch Butterfly
which seeks out the common Milkweed varieties. Hence, the purpose of the creature is for checks and balances. The adult butterfly also helps in pollenation.
The same could be said for most all the insects in the wasp family. They likewise have a larva, pupa, adult metamorposis process. They are also preditors that seek out caterpillars to paralyze with their sting and shove down a burrow they've dug and immediately laying an egg on the paralyzed caterpillar which turn feeds on on the paralyze creature, only to morph by encoded genetic instructions into a pupa state to again transform into an adult. So further checks and balances within the ecosystem. Evoluion in no way explains these millions of checks and balances because Darwinian Evolution demands than random mutations (mistakes and copying errors) and filtered natural selection (some type of blind force intelligence , perhaps some animist type god or goddess) are the driving force behind life as we see it and is done so without any purpose or intent. Unfortunately for evolutionists, as time goes onand further research is made, we see that this rather primitive philosophy (which originally came from the Greeks, Egyptians & Babylonians and not Darwin) and worldview do not fit the factual findings of encoded informational instructions of the individual componants (insects, plants, animals, micro-biology, etc) all fitting within themselves into specifically engineered and planned ecosytems, all of which have further instructions to allow for variations of change and adaptations to fit what ever circumstances when the environment demands it.
In another laboratory setting, a population of Escherichia coli bacteria developed the ability to metabolize a nutrient which the species normally cannot use.
Again, the question has to be asked, "what is the natural environment in which we find E.coli
and what role or purpose do they perform ?"
They are for the most part found in the digestive tracks animals, fish and birds, etc. Their primary function is to digest food into various simple sugars for the host to obsorb and utilize as food and then further process the waste. They tackle whatever is through at them or simply ignore it until a later time and allow it to pass on through. They are in a constant engineering state with purpose and intent because of the instructions encoded into their DNA
If you want to see great amounts of variety and change in E.coli
within a challenging environment, then wait for Andrew Zimmern & Anthony Bourdain
to die, then extract the contents of their colons and find out what super-organism E.coli
have been developed by actions of two individuals who'se eating habits would kill the average person on the street from some of the stuff they've wolfed down in the puruit of shock culinary entertainment. (Hmmm, maybe it's colonary)