This line of reasoning is entirely faulty. I have no more than a high school education, as far as papers go, should I keep my mouth shut about all subject matters until I have a slip of paper that purports my qualifications?
As long as you are being honest about history, i accept anyone
to debate, i don't care about qualification. However all i have seen in this thread is evolutionist lies and dishonesty. I don't tolerate lies.
Let's make it real simple:
1. History only begins with the historical record (ancient writings).
2. Anything before this, it speculative
and not real history.
When did the historical record begin?
It began only a few thousand years ago, there are no ancient texts or documentated evidences of history before this period. Thw following quote notes of this fact:''It should be remembered...that real history is available for only the past few thousand years. The beginning of [known] written records... dates from about 2200BC and 3500BC. To keep things in perspective, one should remember that no one can possibly know what happened before there were people to observe and record what happened. Science means ''knowledge'' and the essence of scientific method is...observation
- Scientific Creationism, Henry Morris, 1985, p.131.
The evolutionists in this thread however ignorantly think it is a 'fact', man is hundred's of thousands of years old. When i asked them were they there to observe that, they then attacked my beliefs or typed out some other garbage.
So this combined with the fact PhilC and Geode don't even have a degree in history is why I just don't want to waste my time debating liars.
So we have lies + people who don't even have an education in history. It's a disgusting mix, which just wastes my time.
No one tollerates liars or dishonesty.