Two examples out of hundreds: First, continental drift. Evidence shows that the continents were recently (in geological terms) united in one supercontinent, Pangea. I believe creationists accept this. The only way for the continents to have gotten from there to the positions they're at now is by observed continental drift , which occurs at a few centimeters a year. That rate can never have been significantly faster without causing enormous earthquakes, and there's no way they could have been created by a flood.
Yes the Bible supports the concept behind 'Pangea' or a single landmass as having once existed (see Genesis 1: 9).
Second: Ice cores rings. These rings are layers laid down each year by snowfall. There's no way they could be produced by, or even survive, a global flood. These layers easily go back hundreds of thousands of years.
The Ice Age didn't predate the flood. No creationist believes it did. Secondly your statement ''these layers go back hundreds of thousands of years'' is just another statement of your faith.
Creation scientist Michael Oard (PhD) has published a book detailing the scientific evidence that shows the ice age was caused by the climatic upheaval of the Genesis Flood:
I'm not talking about the speed of light. I'm talking about the life cycles of stars. The sun is about 5 billion years old, and has about as much life left. We've seen starts at all points in their life cycle, from red giants which need to be at least 8 or 9 billion years old, to young stars only a few hundred million years old. Were they created that way, to look much older than they actually are?
The life cycle of stars is only a few thousand years, not billions or millions.
See my old thread:
Tree rings can go back up to 10,000 years. There's no evidence of an enormous flood. In fact, such a flood would destroy those trees.
The 10,000 year figure is assumption, based on the assumption of only certain rings per year. As scott said - bogus.
Do you know how big the universe is? There are four hundred billion stars in this galaxy alone.
And that's what the Bible says. The Bible frequently describes the great number of stars in the heavens (see Genesis 22: 17; Jeremiah 33:22)
Right, because humans are never mistaken. Oh wait, except you just made a big post about how humans are mistaken. And these are modern scientists working with modern technology, not primitive tribes who think the sun is a chariot flown by a god. If we're not trustworthy, why are they?
Ok this gives me an idea for a new thread. Looks like i can educate you there about ancient technologies. Ancient man was not primitive.