By the same token then Christians should be able use the same line of reasoning and use the universe by inference as proof that God exists. I think they are using a double standard.
The function of a courtroom is for an aid in deciding what "truth" is in a situation where there is little or no empirical evidence. Using their (evos) logic the only place to discuss evo would be in a courtroom situation. Evolution then would be sujective "truth." it would not objective truth as they seem to claim.
This cleared up my confusion also. We see it the same.
I see what you are saying. Again sounds like they have a double standard.
Your profile lists you as an agnostic thatÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s why I used the thing about suspension of disbelief. Actually you do come across as a creationist most of the timeÃ¢â‚¬â€no problem for me. Be what you want to be.
Hey I am not an agreement freak! I can handle disagreement without a meltdown or an atempt at negative control tacticts. I know you are all to out to get me. You are all plotting. You took a vote last night and decided to be against me didn't you and without any empiracal evidence either.
Yep its full-on double standards however unfortunately it is never seen in that light. To them, they already believe evolution is true hence they are allowed to do this, (because to them evolution is already true)
Yes I am agnostic. To put it more specifically, I am a theistic agnostic ie- "I believe in God, but I don't believe in religion"
Lol it was a close vote 13 /12