I made a strong case for a designer such as God earlier in this post. However I'd like to add a bit more.
While you have acknowledged that the validity of The Bible is off topic, I will use the validity of The Bible as my second piece of evidence for God. You say that you can quote Bible verses that you say contradict each other, but a simple google search for the contradiction will provide an answer to any contradiction that you can muster. All "contradictions" of The Bible have been addressed and The Bible remains infallible and is verified by historians and archeology. This is the most telling evidence for the Christian God.
I am aware that rebuttals have been made to arguments that the bible has flaws, but many of them are not very convincing although some explain things perfectly. Since you are using the bible as evidence of creation, then I will have to address its claims. First I will give you my position of the bible. I positively believe that the bible is not divine. Many atheists think that the bible is all forgery and evil and then many theists think it is divine. In find these positions to be extreme and I try to have a balanced view of the book.
The old testament is a collection of the religious writings of the Hebrew people that has many good things in it but is also just as fallible as the people who wrote it. The old testament contains Hebrew history, poetry, laws, moral philosophy, and mythology. In many places these are quite intertwined. The new testament contains the gospels which were written about Jesus decades after his death that probably contain an exaggerated version of his life. Subsequent books in the New Testament contains the various moral writings, history of the Christian churches, and philosophy of the followers of Jesus.
The bible has been translated and retranslated several times and many of the books were probably written well after the events they describe. The bible contains the documents that were approved by Roman Emperor Constantine in the Council of Nicea and many religious documents were left out of the bible. The bible contains factual and moral imperfections because its writers were imperfect.
I disagree. The findings of DNA fits the Creationist model and leaves evolution with more questions.
I believe the evidence is contrary to The Big Bang, but you are right, it is off topic.
Of course, just like subsequent findings in atomic theory give atomic theory more to explain. This still does not displace the tons of evidence of in favor of atomic theory as long as new data does not disprove the theory. Usually new data disproves minor points of the theory that has to be tweaked and added to.
Genetic information is written via tinkering of DNA, activating/deactivating present genes, and deleting genes. If you are talking about gene duplication, it is a poor explanation for the variety of life. Especially if you believe that the variety of life came from a single replicating cell, gene, or what have you.
Addition is a situation in which mutations add genes to the genome. Individual genes can be added or entire sequences or chromosomes. Usually additions that have very little effect on the body are the best. Mutations are an integral idea in microevolution or the evolution within speces.
Before we talk about information to much, I would like you to define it.
Which of the below options is information?
Increased genetic variety in a population.
Increased genetic material.
Novel genetic material.
Novel genetically-regulated abilities.