First of all can anyone support the claim that some laws were symbolic and neither moral or immoral? Scripture please, because I was told that all of the laws of the Tanach were based on love.
(On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets.”)
Secondly, did Abraham turn his back on grace because he got circumcised? Did the Messiah profit him nothing because he got circumcised? Or was he the example of our faith?
(11 and he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had while uncircumcised, so that he might be the father of all who believe without being circumcised, that righteousness might be credited to them,)
Thirdly, you cannot appeal to the very thing that is being debated as support for your argument. You claim that there are two gospels and therefore your position is correct when in fact you need to support that there are two gospels in the first place. You will need to supply at least two or three Scriptures (witnesses), because I know of your high standards and you would not ask anything of others without fulfilling the same requirement.
Fourthly, you have not dealt with the scriptural support for there always being a remnant of Israel. Were they cut off completely? If they were not then all of your theories are mute.
Lastly, explain why being grafted into "their olive tree" does not mean what it says? (I think you misspoke on you reply)
Answer my questions first.