Chirality is produced by the mechanism of the reaction. Fixed geometry produces homochirality. Those are the characteristics of reality. There is no defiance of natural law.
Law of Biogenesis.... It was mentioned in the first page....... (As I said go re-read, since we are now covering the same things over and over since you continue to beat around the bush)
We have already covered this and you forgot to reply to my response in post# 31"6. NO! Chirality is due to the physical nature of the compound, yes the compound is created via components, however chirality itself is an innate characteristic based on the compounds physical form. It is merely a property of asymmetry, asymmetry isn't "created" within something it is a characteristic of it.
If you claim that it is created then there would be a time when the compound existed and yet had no enantiomers which is an absurd notion since asymmetry cannot be created. As I said your hands are enantiomers, now consider have your hands always been like that? Were there a process to make them to become chiral? or is being chiral just a product of their physical form? (which I have been stating many posts back)"
Chirality is a property of asymmetry, asymmetry is a physical property of the molecule itself. Like your hands they are enantiomers of each other because that is the way they are.
However even IF you are correct it still does nothing to support your argument, the fact of the matter is that even in a solution of 100% of one form of enantiomers, it changes to the 50-50 mix over time. Basically you are beating around the bush. You have to deal with enantiomers and there is no known method for dealing with them.... Hence your position is solely based on faith.
Here it is simply
- nucleotide bases and aminoacids are asymmetrical, (enantiomers)
- DNA / RNA / proteins require one form of enantiomer
- if the "wrong" enantiomer bonds to a chain then the chain is useless
enantiomers are found as a 50-50 mixture
- there is no known natural process outside of life that creates 100% solutions of enantiomers
- therefore the chance of a "wrong" enantiomer is at least 50% each time (increasing slightly as the "right" ones get used up)
- based on this the chances of creating a strand of workable DNA / RNA / protein is impossible based on statistics.
This is for a 150 unit long chain.... (consider that DNA requires much much more)
.5^150 = 7x10^-46
Now this probability is only based on the chirality ie- 50% at each unit... There are other statistical impossibilities
Such as genetic chaos, (or entropy)http://www.mathemati...ic_Chaos__.html
Furthermore here are some scientists who disagree with your position leading to demolish your claims about how all scientists support abiogenesis
"Harold Morowitz, a biophysicist, compared the number of interactions needed to randomly produce a living cell with the number of interactions available since the beginning of the universe. The mathematical probabilities are so small that we ought to see no life at all at this stage of the earth’s history. The probability of assembling amino acid building blocks into a functional protein is also too small to consider possible. Random assembly is therefore ruled out of the question.
Hoyle comments, “The current scenario of the origins of life is about as likely as the assembly of a fully functional (Boeing) 747 by a tornado whirling about in a junkyard.” The Darwinian theory of evolution fails to predict what we actually currently observe. Schutzenberger, a mathematician writes, “There is a considerable gap in the neo-Darwinian theory of evolution, and we believe the gap to be of such a nature that it cannot be bridged by the current conception of biology."http://www.pilgrimto...mathematics.htm