Go back and reread Mike Summer's statement. Where is the Ad Hominem attack? Let me remind you that an ad hom is a statement that attacks a person's character rather than responding to their argument. He was not responding to an argument, rather saying evolutionists think they are always right, grouping them with Stalin, Hitler, and Marx, which he calls scary. I would call this stereotyping, not ad hominem.
The warning in Ringo's post was an explanation for the suspension, not a description of what was going on in that post in particular. So what was the difference between this and Ringo's post? Context. In that particular post Ringo was trolling, dodging the question posed to him and posting a stereotype of Creationists as an attempt to evoke an emotional response rather than further the discussion that I was having with him. Mike Summers shows no such intent to troll, but to discuss his point "people who think that they are always "right" are very scary. This can easily lead into a discussion that creationists can be just as scary, thus quite easily expanding the examples he provided to point out quite embarrassingly that his statement has larger implications than he originally intended.
Would it surprise you to know that Ringo is still allowed to post here? (as long as he follows the forum rules of course)
I am fully aware that everyone has bias. That is actually one of my big arguments against people suggesting that all science is objective.
If you would like to do things properly in the future, you should try using the report button for posts that you believe contain rule infractions. This time you chose to handle this situation poorly with intent to cause spectacle and challenge the wisdom of the forum moderators (me in particular) concerning past handling of infractions. You only showed your own ignorance about what happened with Ringo and earned yourself a:
WARNING: Complaining about forum moderation is against the forum rules and will not be tolerated.
Oh, what a surprise! Moose, you've only been here a few days and already arguing with the moderators.
Was it too much to expect that you would bring forth some great dissertation giving evidence for evolution? What is your purpose here anyway? Are you looking to get kicked off so you run back to your comrades on EvC and tell them how you were 'treated' on this creationist website?
State your case, fella. We are waiting.