Jump to content


Increase In Information By Mutations?

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
41 replies to this topic

#41 Mike Summers

Mike Summers

    Veteran Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 3,510 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Information theory, electronics, videography, writing, human psychology, psychotherapy
  • Age: 61
  • Christian
  • Creationist
  • Detroit Michigan area

Posted 22 January 2013 - 10:14 PM

O sa kan u sea bi thu don's earl lee lite.
Tis mutated code did no result in an increase in information---no not even a change in information..

#42 Dig4gold



  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,045 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Age: 53
  • Judaism non-orthodox
  • Young Earth Creationist
  • Raleigh, NC

Posted 28 January 2013 - 07:27 PM

"Duplication isn't new information. It is just doubling existing data". Mark Forbes #22

That is a very important point!

Duplication or deleting can change the existing code but it has limits. It can only do so much and more often than not it causes problems, i.e., mutations which are usually detrimental to an organism.

It may sound circular to some but in order to add complex functions to an organism there must necessarily be an increase in useful information or "code".

Using existing code would limit function to a finite goal. In my opinion it could not take a fish to a bird.

We observe variation within a certain type or kind of species but not an upward ascent of a lower species to a higher order. Again, there are limits without the infusion of new meaningful information which the scientists tell us requires an intelligent source.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users