Piasan: Quantity does not mean quality. In the US, we have a phrase: "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull ****."
One of the most eloquent speeches in US history, Lincoln's Gettysburg address, was only 272 words.
But sometimes a lack of quantity removes the presence of any reasoning. For example if I say to you, 2no you are wrong", it simply isn't possible for such a short response to contain a counter-argument.
To reason your case you have to explain things, it is unavoidable. Even your post for example just now, took some reasoning to explain what you meant. You had to give an example, etc...but it seems to me Driewerf doesn't do anything except state things in short sentences.
That was the point I was making. I wasn't saying that my posts were of fantastic quality, I just think it is pretty unjust when someone provides over a thousand words of explanation and is basically replied to with a flippant fart in the face, because D's posts are quite frankly, contentless, 90% of the time.
Secondly, assuming you believe the bible is God's word, wouldn't a topic like this be the perfect place to support the position of defending the bible as God's word, if you believe in it, rather than arguing with the one making a case that it is God's word.
Assuming you believe the bible is God's word, because it seems you have made no comment on that, and have only defended an anti-theist that says it isn't His word.
Piasan: Another example.... in another discussion you had claimed accelerated nuclear decay. You could have gone on for hundreds to thousands of words posting creationist research supporting such decay. But I could still dismantle the claim with a couple dozen words from the leader of the R.A.T.E. project who pointed out that such decay would melt the planet.