Mike Summers: I am so afraid of what big bad evo will do to me! I am trembling! Maybe it won''t select for me! LOL
Lol. Nice one Mike. appreciate this humour.
Mike I've got some good news for you friend. Jesus Christ is the selector. That means all blind, crippled, and diseased are at the top of his list; "for the first shall be last and the last first".
Unlike Hitler, a balrog of hell, those who believe in the Lord and love Him, obey Him. "If you love me,you will obey me" - Christ. (paraphrase)
All of the evil doctrines that come from the bowels of hell such as replacement theology, where the catholics pretend the bible is saying that, "holy mother church" is now Israel, to the EVIL anti-semitic doctrine that the Jews are to blame for Christ's death, are just that - evil twistifications of truth. The point of Christ dying on the cross was that He laid down His life for the sins of mankind, so how can the Jews have caused that, when it was God's plan since before, "the foundations of the earth" were laid? The lamb slain since before time, the bible tells us. Christ also predicted His own death.
The STUPIDEST argument, isn't the complaint that milk has been spilt, but it is the complaint about milk that was not even spilt.
When they argue the Jews were to blame for Christ's death, one of the premises of that argument is to believe that Christ's death means something temporal, and is a tragedy that can't be undone. In other words, you have to believe the resurrection did not happen, in order to accept that argument, meaning that you don't accept what the bible says to begin with or understand anything about the cross and why it happened, which the NT explains.
When Christ was resurrected what did He say in the bible? Did He say this; "now go and get revenge on all Jews and build the Fatherland".
Grow a brain atheists! You are DEFENDING Hitler as a Christian. What you are doing is no different to defending him had he stated he was innocent. Think about it - if I said to you, "Hitler was guilty of mass murder" would you provide quotes of all of the things he said which you believe would make him innocent? Would words make him innocent? So then if he claimed to do things for God and Christianity, do his words make him innocent? Right now that is what I see Driewerf doing - he seems to be defending Hitler's claims. Perhaps Driewerf can clarify that for us. Are you saying Hitler was a Christian genuinely, simply because he said things and pretended to have God's interests at heart? If you are, have you noticed that a real Christian (me), can actually SHOW YOU what God has really said in the scriptures so as to show you that Hitler's claims contradicted those scriptures?
The argument that the Jews killed Christ, is perhaps one of the silliest arguments in history, it is not even technically, "wrong" because it does not yet qualify as a wrong argument YET. LOL!
Think about it, it would be like complaining about milk that has not been spilt. Heck that isn't even a wrong argument it's so false. In order for an argument to be wrong, first it has to qualify at the basic level of "comprehensible". It depends as an argument, on not knowing what the bible has explained. It would be like me making an argument that you can't be an evolutionist because evolution states that brains can't contain any sentience.
That would not even yet count as an argument because evolution DOESN'T state that. The "jews killed Christ" argument DEPENDS on a false understanding of the bible.
When folk blame the Jews for Christ's death, an equal silliness is to not even KNOW that the bible says that Christ returned and gave His commission on earth. Notice it wasn't to, "go out into all the world and slaughter Jews in revenge". No indeed - His commission was to preach the gospel to the whole world.
It actually proves Hitler never actually understood the basics of the bible which many atheists do understand, because it appears he didn't even know that Christ spoke about the Kingdom-objective on earth AFTER He was resurrected, and his commission was a peaceful continuation of His work to preach the truth. The NT letters then shows the response to that commission, and it had nothing to do with blaming certain races of people or eliminating the weak.
Hitler's argument has onion-skin layers of ignorance to it, layer after layer, Hitler didn't seem to even understand that the cross was about forgiveness ANYWAY. That is why Christ came, to die on the cross to pay the sin-debt, the second Adam. The NT letters explains this. It is one more farcical thing about the "blame the Jews" arguing - that even had the argument been correct, the gospel preaches forgiveness!!!!!