I see what evo scientists mean when they say evo has speeded up!.
Recently in Orlanndol Florida, America had it's largest mass killing. One of evo's agents decided to eliminate 49 people from the gene pool! That's evo in action. It's evo's reality and not your fiction or the imaginary rules you write for evo. Apparently, resistance to evo is futile! Who knows who will be the next "unfit" victim of natural selection!
Sorry, Mike.... that is not "evo in action."
Evolution is not based on destruction of the weak. As Mile W points out, the real "survival of the fittest" is actually differential reproduction. Those who have the most surviving offspring that leave offspring are the ones who are more likely to have their genes continue.
The most "fit" isn't necessarily the biggest and strongest. In a drought, which is more likely to survive and leave offspring ..... the elephant that needs to eat 60 pounds of grass and drink 30 gallons of water a day with a 2 year gestation period.... or the mouse that can live a week on a teaspoon of grain and an equivalent amount of water while reproducing in only 20 days?
Which male is more likely to have offspring .... the one that attracts many females or the one that attracts none? (Hint: Females don't always find the strongest male the most attractive.)
You sometimes say that evolution will select against you. Sorry, Mike .... despite all your health problems, the fact that you are here says you have been selected "for." At your indicated age (61) your reproductive years are most likely done. If you have any children, then you have again been selected "for." With grandchildren, that string of successful selections continues ......
For some reason, you want to blame evolution for all the evils of the world. There are a number of things wrong with that.
First: Even if it were true it would have nothing to do with whether or not the theory is valid. Therefore, our creationist logicians should have long ago called that one for what it is .... a poisoning the well fallacy.
Second: The first sin.... which is where evil entered the world .... wasn't due to "survival of the fittest." It was so "your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God" (Gen 3:5). The cause of the sin was jealousy or envy, not "survival of the fittest."
Third: The first crime .... which was after evil entered the world .... also was the result of jealousy or envy regarding who was the "favorite" (for lack of a better term) of God.
Of course, this has been explained before and probably will need to be explained again ......