Jump to content


Photo

How Can God Use A Cause If Evolution Is A Cause?


  • Please log in to reply
86 replies to this topic

#81 what if

what if

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 405 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Age: 61
  • no affiliation
  • Agnostic
  • indiana

Posted 27 March 2017 - 09:05 AM

Except that Popper had the guts to see and admit his error.

we've all seen, with this ayala charade, how "retractions" are extracted and spread all over the web.
i wouldn't believe a "retraction" unless i was standing right in front of the person making it.

the crazy part is, most evolutionists are still going to believe ayala made his "retraction" even though there is ZERO indication that ayala ever made it.

#82 driewerf

driewerf

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 624 posts
  • Age: 43
  • no affiliation
  • Atheist
  • Belgium

Posted 27 March 2017 - 12:17 PM

we've all seen, with this ayala charade, how "retractions" are extracted and spread all over the web.
i wouldn't believe a "retraction" unless i was standing right in front of the person making it.

the crazy part is, most evolutionists are still going to believe ayala made his "retraction" even though there is ZERO indication that ayala ever made it.

I posted a link to the entire text of Popper's lecture. Of course if you know better what Karl Popper thought and meant than Popper himself...



#83 Blitzking

Blitzking

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 360 posts
  • Age: 55
  • Christian
  • Young Earth Creationist
  • California

Posted 27 March 2017 - 12:24 PM

Quote mine?
You like modifying 
 

into
"Mud to man is your myth" 
 
If I'm good a quote mining, that's because i learned it from the best: you.



If you think that I am going to change my description of Satan's delusional Lie of Evolution

from

the Mindless MYO Mud to Man Myth

To

The Mindless MYO

Hydrothermal Vents, Directed / Balistic Panspermia, Magic RNA, Autotropic / Heterotropic cells, Coacervates, Endosymbiotic Chloroplasts,or Polypeptide Chains

to MAN Myth

Just to please Science Deniers like yourself

You sir, don't know me very well!

#84 driewerf

driewerf

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 624 posts
  • Age: 43
  • no affiliation
  • Atheist
  • Belgium

Posted 27 March 2017 - 01:23 PM

If you think that I am going to change my description of Satan's delusional Lie of Evolution

from

the Mindless MYO Mud to Man Myth

To

The Mindless MYO

Hydrothermal Vents, Directed / Balistic Panspermia, Magic RNA, Autotropic / Heterotropic cells, Coacervates, Endosymbiotic Chloroplasts,or Polypeptide Chains

to MAN Myth

Just to please Science Deniers like yourself

You sir, don't know me very well!

Of course I don't expect that from you. Truth doesn't matter to you.

And by the way:

- magic RNA? What's magic about RNA?

- it's autotrophic/ heterotrophic.



#85 what if

what if

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 405 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Age: 61
  • no affiliation
  • Agnostic
  • indiana

Posted 27 March 2017 - 05:58 PM

I posted a link to the entire text of Popper's lecture. Of course if you know better what Karl Popper thought and meant than Popper himself...

a couple of questions:
what is the source of this retraction.
and, since it it a retraction, what is the original statement?

#86 Blitzking

Blitzking

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 360 posts
  • Age: 55
  • Christian
  • Young Earth Creationist
  • California

Posted 27 March 2017 - 10:35 PM

Of course I don't expect that from you. Truth doesn't matter to you.

And by the way:

- magic RNA? What's magic about RNA?

- it's autotrophic/ heterotrophic.

 

"Truth doesn't matter to you."

 

Nope.. The Truth is all I care about, that is why I reject Satan's Delusional Lie of Abiogenesis followed by UCA for all flora and fauna. AKA "Evolution" :gilligan:

 

"magic RNA? What's magic about RNA?" 

 

Oh, so you haven't heard about the "RNA world hypothesis" Now THAT my friend is MAGIC!! :snapoutofit:

 

 

Evolution is promoted by its practitioners as more than mere science. Evolution is promulgated as an ideology, as secular religion—a full-fledged alternative to Christianity, with meaning and morality. I am an ardent evolutionist and an ex-Christian, but I must admit that in this one complaintand Mr. Gish is but one of many to make it—the literalists are absolutely right. Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today”3 (Ruse).


  • Calypsis4 likes this

#87 driewerf

driewerf

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 624 posts
  • Age: 43
  • no affiliation
  • Atheist
  • Belgium

Posted 28 March 2017 - 05:31 AM

"Truth doesn't matter to you."

 

Nope.. The Truth is all I care about, that is why I reject Satan's Delusional Lie of Abiogenesis followed by UCA for all flora and fauna. AKA "Evolution" 

Satan's lie? 

Darwin's theory you mean (later expanded and improved by thousands of other scientists). Satan, who just like god I doesn't believe to exist, has/had nothing to do in this.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users