Jump to content


Photo

How Can God Use A Cause If Evolution Is A Cause?


  • Please log in to reply
87 replies to this topic

#81 what if

what if

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 405 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Age: 61
  • no affiliation
  • Agnostic
  • indiana

Posted 27 March 2017 - 09:05 AM

Except that Popper had the guts to see and admit his error.

we've all seen, with this ayala charade, how "retractions" are extracted and spread all over the web.
i wouldn't believe a "retraction" unless i was standing right in front of the person making it.

the crazy part is, most evolutionists are still going to believe ayala made his "retraction" even though there is ZERO indication that ayala ever made it.

#82 driewerf

driewerf

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 624 posts
  • Age: 43
  • no affiliation
  • Atheist
  • Belgium

Posted 27 March 2017 - 12:17 PM

we've all seen, with this ayala charade, how "retractions" are extracted and spread all over the web.
i wouldn't believe a "retraction" unless i was standing right in front of the person making it.

the crazy part is, most evolutionists are still going to believe ayala made his "retraction" even though there is ZERO indication that ayala ever made it.

I posted a link to the entire text of Popper's lecture. Of course if you know better what Karl Popper thought and meant than Popper himself...



#83 Blitzking

Blitzking

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 361 posts
  • Age: 55
  • Christian
  • Young Earth Creationist
  • California

Posted 27 March 2017 - 12:24 PM

Quote mine?
You like modifying 
 

into
"Mud to man is your myth" 
 
If I'm good a quote mining, that's because i learned it from the best: you.



If you think that I am going to change my description of Satan's delusional Lie of Evolution

from

the Mindless MYO Mud to Man Myth

To

The Mindless MYO

Hydrothermal Vents, Directed / Balistic Panspermia, Magic RNA, Autotropic / Heterotropic cells, Coacervates, Endosymbiotic Chloroplasts,or Polypeptide Chains

to MAN Myth

Just to please Science Deniers like yourself

You sir, don't know me very well!

#84 driewerf

driewerf

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 624 posts
  • Age: 43
  • no affiliation
  • Atheist
  • Belgium

Posted 27 March 2017 - 01:23 PM

If you think that I am going to change my description of Satan's delusional Lie of Evolution

from

the Mindless MYO Mud to Man Myth

To

The Mindless MYO

Hydrothermal Vents, Directed / Balistic Panspermia, Magic RNA, Autotropic / Heterotropic cells, Coacervates, Endosymbiotic Chloroplasts,or Polypeptide Chains

to MAN Myth

Just to please Science Deniers like yourself

You sir, don't know me very well!

Of course I don't expect that from you. Truth doesn't matter to you.

And by the way:

- magic RNA? What's magic about RNA?

- it's autotrophic/ heterotrophic.



#85 what if

what if

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 405 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Age: 61
  • no affiliation
  • Agnostic
  • indiana

Posted 27 March 2017 - 05:58 PM

I posted a link to the entire text of Popper's lecture. Of course if you know better what Karl Popper thought and meant than Popper himself...

a couple of questions:
what is the source of this retraction.
and, since it it a retraction, what is the original statement?

#86 Blitzking

Blitzking

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 361 posts
  • Age: 55
  • Christian
  • Young Earth Creationist
  • California

Posted 27 March 2017 - 10:35 PM

Of course I don't expect that from you. Truth doesn't matter to you.

And by the way:

- magic RNA? What's magic about RNA?

- it's autotrophic/ heterotrophic.

 

"Truth doesn't matter to you."

 

Nope.. The Truth is all I care about, that is why I reject Satan's Delusional Lie of Abiogenesis followed by UCA for all flora and fauna. AKA "Evolution" :gilligan:

 

"magic RNA? What's magic about RNA?" 

 

Oh, so you haven't heard about the "RNA world hypothesis" Now THAT my friend is MAGIC!! :snapoutofit:

 

 

Evolution is promoted by its practitioners as more than mere science. Evolution is promulgated as an ideology, as secular religion—a full-fledged alternative to Christianity, with meaning and morality. I am an ardent evolutionist and an ex-Christian, but I must admit that in this one complaintand Mr. Gish is but one of many to make it—the literalists are absolutely right. Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today”3 (Ruse).


  • Calypsis4 likes this

#87 driewerf

driewerf

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 624 posts
  • Age: 43
  • no affiliation
  • Atheist
  • Belgium

Posted 28 March 2017 - 05:31 AM

"Truth doesn't matter to you."

 

Nope.. The Truth is all I care about, that is why I reject Satan's Delusional Lie of Abiogenesis followed by UCA for all flora and fauna. AKA "Evolution" 

Satan's lie? 

Darwin's theory you mean (later expanded and improved by thousands of other scientists). Satan, who just like god I doesn't believe to exist, has/had nothing to do in this.



#88 Blitzking

Blitzking

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 361 posts
  • Age: 55
  • Christian
  • Young Earth Creationist
  • California

Posted 29 March 2017 - 10:05 PM

Satan's lie? 

Darwin's theory you mean (later expanded and improved by thousands of other scientists). Satan, who just like god I doesn't believe to exist, has/had nothing to do in this.

 

"Darwin's theory you mean (later expanded and improved by thousands of other scientists)" :burp:

 

Instead of "Expanded and improved", wouldn't it be a lot more intellectually honest to say that they added lots of ad hoc rescue hypotheses and just so stories to cover the fact that their hypothetical hypothesis of Abiogenesis followed by UCA for all flora and fauna didn't even come close to fulfilling its predictions or matching the facts on the ground AKA "Real Life"?  

 

"Evolution" "Predicts" EVERYTHING

So they have ALL THE BASES COVERED!!!!

1 Instant "Evolution" (One Generation) Hopeful Monsters / SALTATION

2 Fast "Evolution" PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM

3 Slow ..Plodding Methodological "Evolution" DARWINIAN MODEL

4 Non Existent "Evolution" 300 MYO LIVING FOSSILS

So evolution happens....

INSTANTLY
QUICKLY
SLOWLY
NEVER

The predictive power of "Evolution" is sure amazing isnt it? LOL  :worship:

 

"Imagine a room in which a body lies crushed, flat as a pancake. A dozen detectives crawl around, examining the floor with magnifying glasses for any clue to the identity of the perpetrator. In the middle of the room, next to the body, stands a large, gray elephant. The detectives carefully avoid bumping into the pachyderm’s legs as they crawl, and never even glance at it. Over time the detectives get frustrated with their lack of progress but resolutely press on, looking even more closely at the floor. You see, textbooks say detectives must “get their man,” so they never even consider elephants. There is an elephant in the roomful of scientists who are trying to explain the development of life. The elephant is labeled “intelligent design.” To a person who does not feel obliged to restrict his search to unintelligent causes, the straightforward conclusion is that many biochemical systems were designed.    Darwin's Black Box"


  • mike the wiz likes this




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


    Bing (1)