It's one of those arguments I hear evolutionists argue, and creationists also. It's that famously touted, ever regurgitated complaint; "no evidence would ever convince you."
It is a charge I for one can accept as I will explain.
The reason you can never convince me macro evolution occurred is because to my mind, it is rationally absurd. I don't say that as an insult. Yes we know that in theist-atheist debate, we all sometimes say things like; "fairytale for adults" or, "your belief in skydaddy", etc...but I don't mean it in that way, I just mean that I myself can't convince my own mind that it would ever be realistic to entertain the notion that lightning zapped some sludge and later on it gave you giraffes and trees.
I think this is because the clear facts show a creation. When we look at the creativity of trees, birds, the colour the symmetry, the aesthetics, even the famous types of animal, like a horse or an eagle. These are all clearly invented to be what they are, they just aren't the result of random change. We can clearly see a creative hand at work. An eagle is majestic, a horse is elegant, these are all facts.
When I think of the eyeball, Darwin's explanation is preposterous to my mind. Not just because I find it unbelievable as that would only be an argument from incredulity, but rather I would find it irrational in the same way you would ask me to believe superman existed.
That is my example for this thread, a question, and here it is;
What evidence would it take to convince you superman existed?
The correct answer is, "none", because superman just doesn't exist. In the same way, macro evolution just doesn't exist. yes you can try and make it seem oh so scientific and verified. So what - I'm clever enough to see through that, to the patent truth that it simply did not happen. Why would it? Why would the perfect design of flight feathers just happen to create themselves? It's totally dumb, when the obvious cause is that all of the sophistication is there by clear design.
I think on a human level, people deep down, even the evolutionists, know that when they look at what exists on earth it just isn't evolution that done it. They know that this is just the answer science had to come up with so that mankind could follow their own destiny.
Why even pretend I am wrong? Come on - deep down you don't believe mud-zapped sludge would lead to giraffes and trees. I know you don't.
You can't kid a kidder.
It didn't happen folks, and we all know I'm right. No amount of evidence can force it to be true, because how can it be? Answer; it can't, of course it can't, just like superman can't, which is why it doesn't matter what evidence you show me.