Jump to content


Photo

Man's Organs Create An Unsurmountable Problem For Accidentalists


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 Blitzking

Blitzking

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 511 posts
  • Age: 55
  • Christian
  • Young Earth Creationist
  • California

Posted 23 May 2017 - 06:42 PM

Man has 10 INTERDEPENDENT VITAL Organs and support systems. FACT

 

Man NEEDS all 10 of his VITAL Organs or he dies. FACT

 

Either those 10 VITAL Organs came together ALL AT ONCE (Creation) OR they Evolved separately.. FACT

 

If they "Evolved" Separately they must have had an order of Evolution FACT

 

For "Evolution" to be even considered to qualify as a hypothetical hypothesis There MUST BE

a PLAUSIBLE or FEASABLE Explanation as to the evolutionary order that would be possible.

 

For Example.. What comes First? Man is Irreducibly Complex (BY DEFINITION)

 

Stomach? Skin? Heart? Lungs? Brain? Upper Intestine? Liver? Lower Intestine? Pancreas? Kidneys?

 

Remove just ONE and Man Dies.. And Bye Bye Evolution..

 

So which one do we start with..? Here, let me help you out.. 1 Skin? 2 Stomach? 3 Brain? 4 Heart?

 

You see... Whatever way you start you cause more problems for the myth.. :think:

 

Becasue ALL 10 NEED TO BE THERE.. TOGETHER, WORKING IN TANDEM, AT THE SAME TIME

 

Atheists like to point out Lungfish or Nematodes that dont have all ten organs as if that helps their case.

 

IT DOES NOT... Lungfish and Nematodes are ALSO IRREDUCIBLY COMPLEX!!! So unless you can

show a FEASABLE OR PLAUSIBLE pathway for them to turn into a Human, they are a NON SEQUITUR...

 

Anyone like to take a stab at it? :dono:



#2 Fjuri

Fjuri

    Veteran Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,808 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Age: 31
  • no affiliation
  • Atheist
  • Belgium

Posted 24 May 2017 - 04:28 AM

Man has 10 INTERDEPENDENT VITAL Organs and support systems. FACT

 

Man NEEDS all 10 of his VITAL Organs or he dies. FACT

Sure

 

Either those 10 VITAL Organs came together ALL AT ONCE (Creation) OR they Evolved separately.. FACT

 

If they "Evolved" Separately they must have had an order of Evolution FACT

Not really facts, the first is a false dichotomy. For instance they could have evolved simultaneously.

The second is a play on the word "separately". Separately can simply mean "independent of each other", or "one after the other". For one interpretation your assessment is correct, for the other its not.

 

For "Evolution" to be even considered to qualify as a hypothetical hypothesis There MUST BE

a PLAUSIBLE or FEASABLE Explanation as to the evolutionary order that would be possible.

 

For Example.. What comes First? Man is Irreducibly Complex (BY DEFINITION)

 

Stomach? Skin? Heart? Lungs? Brain? Upper Intestine? Liver? Lower Intestine? Pancreas? Kidneys?

 

Remove just ONE and Man Dies.. And Bye Bye Evolution..

 

So which one do we start with..? Here, let me help you out.. 1 Skin? 2 Stomach? 3 Brain? 4 Heart?

 

You see... Whatever way you start you cause more problems for the myth.. 

 

Becasue ALL 10 NEED TO BE THERE.. TOGETHER, WORKING IN TANDEM, AT THE SAME TIME

 

Atheists like to point out Lungfish or Nematodes that dont have all ten organs as if that helps their case.

 

IT DOES NOT... Lungfish and Nematodes are ALSO IRREDUCIBLY COMPLEX!!! So unless you can

show a FEASABLE OR PLAUSIBLE pathway for them to turn into a Human, they are a NON SEQUITUR...

 

Anyone like to take a stab at it?

The whole "irreducibly complexity" argument is an argument from incredulity. No need to go deeper into it unless the argument gets better substantiated.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users