.Goodybye King of Blitz -- which means extreme inebriation. Welcome to ignore.
I see that you are Still straining at a Gnat (This response to Mike about MEANINGLESS MINUTIAE) Yet Swallowing a Camel (MY DEVASTATING UNANSWERABLE QUESTION Here that will REMAIN unanswered and closes the book on the Darwinian Myth forever) Come to think of it.. It makes sense why you would do so..... What was I thinking... LOL http://evolutionfair...-accidentalists "It (evolution) is sustained largely by a propaganda campaign that relies on all the usual tricks of rhetorical persuasion: hidden assumptions, question-begging statements of what is at issue, terms that are vaguely defined and change their meaning in midargument, attacks of straw men, selective citation of evidence, and so on. The theory is also protected by its cultural importance. It is the officially sanctioned creation story to modern society, and publicly funded educational authorities spare no effort to persuade people to believe it." (Professor Phillip Johnson, "Objections Sustained: Subversive Essays on Evolution, Law and Culture," pg. 9)
.Of course, your question identifies the most basic omission of "mike the w"'s OP story and putative analogy; and that it is fatal to the putative analogy when the camera coverage is inadequate-enough to allow a person with highly-skilled physical machinations to avoid being captured on the footage. His response is an insult--that you failed to ignore what basic reading comprehension skills told you was probably the most basic error in the scenario.I learned well before I stopped posting here the first time that "mike the ..." will not acknowledge when his analogy is faulty. The only thing I can report is that I haven't read any content of his that wields the M-the-W 2+2 Fallacy since I identified the inadequacy of wielding that error, though I haven't read all his content written during my vacation from this site..
How much coverage does the CCTV provide?...
Imagine if we now saw the person was NOT on the CCTV.
Popoi, I've tried to teach you about the relevance of an analogy but I've failed, ...The only point of the CCTV analogy, is to show how absurd it would be for the police to take such a story seriously....
Actually, Blitz is a German word for Lightning or Fast and being that I am a former USA Rapid Chess Champion, I go by the handle Blitzking (Blitz Chess means FAST Chess FYI) NOTHING TO DO with inebriation BTW....
I completely understand why you dont want to hear what I have to say..
If I had the same emotional attachment to Darwin's Myth as you do, I would ignore me as well, because the more you pay attention to my words, and see my indisputable logic, the more you will be forced to recognize the truth that we have been duped into believing a hopeless fairytale for reasons that have ZERO to do with science and EVERYTHING to do with its IMPLICATIONS...
BTW.. Why are you even on this website anyway? Wouldn't you be much happier on one of the Atheist / Pro Evolution websites where they will all tell you just what your ears want to hear just like the Bible predicted 2000 years ago?
"For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. 4 They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths" 2 Timothy 4 : 3,4
"Darwin's theory of evolution is the last of the great nineteenth-century mystery religions. And as we speak it is now following Freudians and Marxism into the Nether regions, and I'm quite sure that Freud, Marx and Darwin are commiserating one with the other in the dark dungeon where discarded gods gather."
(Dr. David Berlinski)