But again, none of that (at least from what I can recall in the threads) is a positive demonstration of design. You simply asked "how did X evolve" and when not presented answers to your satisfication, declared victory for design.
Imagine if you were in a contest with someone else. You were asked a question but your answer wasn't satisfactory. As a result victory was declared for the other person by default. Do you think that's a fair contest?
You can't merely assume design as a defult. You need to have some sort of positive demonstrable criteria to conclude design. From what I've seen of the ID movement, they are working on this problem but they have yet to come up with any empirical verification of their criteria thus far (unless there's been something new published within the last couple years I'm unaware of).
What is the logical cause of intellegent information and order?Ã‚Â
Define "intellegent information". And quantify it with respect to biological forms. Ditto with "order".
You claimed branches on phylogenetic trees were "pulled out of thin air". I responded they are derived via algorthimic methods based on datasets. Where is the smokescreen? I mean, you can read all about this yourself if you don't believe me.