So when we dig up a T-Rex fossil, it dates as old as the layer (millions of years) because the "aged" layer cross contaminated it. That is the old evidence. Now when the bone is broken open and examined. We find T-Rex blood cells, veins and soft tissue.
That is the old and young evidence mixed proving how God created.
I also predict that because science is mostly finding truth minus "any" supernatural event. That a temporal excuse will be made to explain away this evidence instead of testing it against both theories of young and old earth. Which by the way is how science is supposed to work, by looking at "all" possibilities. Not just the ones that the majority view "wants" to be true because they prefer an origins minus a Creator.
I Also predict that they will not accept the creation explanation for finding what they did, and use it until a better theory comes along. Because proving "anything' supernatural, whether true of not, is considered "intellectually cheating". Which by the way is a bias way of thinking because it automatically makes the scientists look in certain directions, but always avoid the one that would tag them with a subject that will destroy all of their credibility. So science is no longer about allowing the evidence to guide it to a conclusion, but making that evidence support the conclusion already made.
This is because every excuse made about this find cannot be confirmed, supported, and goes against all known laws of decay. And most important, it goes against the old earth theory which is a major foundation in which all theories concerning origins are based upon. But all is just ignored because the it's Taboo to challenge the major theory in which all of science evolves around, less one wants to be cast to the wolves of credibility destruction.
If this is not so, then name one person that has ever challenged evolution in favor of creation that did not have his credibility destroyed? Just one person.
What this shows is that the theory of evolution does not remain top dog by it's own merits, but by straight forward intimidation that if a person does not conform to the views set before him. He will not make it in any scientific field. Unless he keeps his ideas and beliefs about creation to himself. It's like one evolutionist said:
Science, is fundamentally, a game with one over riding and defining rule:
Let's see how far, and to what extent we can explain the behavior of the physical and material universe in terms of purely physical and material causes without "EVER" invoking the supernatural. [Involving God] in the explanation constitutes a form of intellectual cheating. A chess player is perfectly capable of smashing his opponents king on the floor during a tournament, but this does not make him a champion because the rules were not followed. Evolution is not promoted because of overwhelming evidence in it's favor, nor is creation rejected for lack of evidence. The biblical creation model is simply ignored because scientists are trained to ignore this possibility. They would be accused of "cheating" if they did accept the evidence for creation.
Richard Dickerson (Biochemist-evolutionist) Member of National Academy of science . February 1, a closer look at the evidence.
I also predict that if God created with age, we would also find biblical verses to support this as well as evidence.
Psalms 102:25 Of old hast thou laid the foundation of the earth: and the heavens are the work of thy hands.
How does one lay an old foundation? He finds aged material.
Then I predict that God will make a direct reference to the foundations of the earth not being parallel with the actual time passage.
Psalms 82:5 They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are out of course.
Course = a direction of time. Much like you take a half or full semester course.
So the foundations of the earth are out of time (course)
I also predict that the word of God will speak of a passage of time that cannot be accounted for, in the attempt to explain creation with age.
Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
In the Biblical time-line. No generations had passed yet. But notice the reference is not pointing to any "live matter" (animals or humans). But is a reference to space (our universe) and the Earth (dead matter).
In the Bible, actual time passage is referred to has the begats. Which shows the tree of ancestors of man (live matter). In the Bible, the reference to aged creation is always a reference to dead matter. So the question needs to be asked, when looking at Biblical time-lines is:
1) Is the Bible referring to dead matter (aged creation)?
2) Or live matter (man's ancestry or actual time passage)?
Categorizing "all" references to time as actual time is the reason the Bible seems confusing. Because the age of the earth is not the same as the age of life. so for one to better understand the difference, the categorization has to be separated like this:
1) Time-line of life, or the living (all living matter). Which is not only measured by life and death, but 24 hour days.
2) The aged creation. Or all dead matter.
So living matter has one time-line, while dead matter has another. So if you combine the two into one through such stuff as the flood. Then they look as if they are combined in time because of cross contamination. A process science cannot deny happens.
So if live matter has one time-line, and dead matter has another time-line. The older aged creation of dead matter will always be older than the live matter. Which is what we observed all because age was added to the creation on the very day it was created
I also predict that God will also give us the formula from which eternity exists, and His powers over time come from.
2 Peter 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
I also predict that some Biblical verse will support some theories.
I believe that 2 Peter 3:8 is a explanation of time dilation, and what it takes for time to become so dilated that it becomes eternal.
I also predict that evidence will be found that will show that the amount of time based upon the old earth theory would put the theory into question.
Human and dinosaur foot prints together:
enhanced_footprint3.jpg 46.01K 36 downloads
Human artifacts found in coal:
doorknobs_clump.jpg 33.46K 61 downloads brunette_slider_coal.jpg 87.29K 63 downloads
Evidence of eye witness accounts of humans seeing dinosaurs:
dino_skin_compare1.jpg 29.42K 66 downloads
I predict that because the evidence cannot be scientifically disproved, that other methods will be used. Such as altering pictures of evidence:
image001.jpg 8.29K 4 downloads.............................. dino.jpg 18.24K 4 downloads
............................. print.jpg 5.25K 4 downloads
meister_box1b_small.jpg 23.3K 58 downloads meister1.jpg 32.94K 4 downloads
Pics were not only altered, but accusations were made about fraud (carving evidence) in which no witness could ever be produced:
burdick_r1s_small.jpg 30.23K 53 downloads burdick1.jpg 19.14K 24 downloads
So if evolution is so true, why all the deceptions and false accusation?
1) Does truth require altering of the opposing evidence so that it will be debunked under false misconceptions?
2) Does truth require destruction of one's credibility to silence the opposition?
3) Does truth require removal of the opposition from the educational system because it cannot stand on it's own merits?
4) Does truth require one to ignore opposing evidence so that a preferred conclusion can dominate?
Only a untruth requires so much deception.
Note: This is less that half of the examples I could have put up.