106 replies to this topic

[ikester7579]

Chicken teeth prove evolution? Is that what you are trying to claim?

[Ron]

Chicken teeth prove evolution? Is that what you are trying to claim?

I enjoyed the blurry picture. It reminded me of the blurry 8mm film of Big Foot strolling away from the cameraman.

Chickengator


Big foot



You be the judge

[stick]

I enjoyed the blurry picture. It reminded me of the blurry 8mm film of Big Foot strolling away from the cameraman. 

surely you're not telling us that you don't believe in bigfoot?

[Ron]

surely you're not telling us that you don't believe in bigfoot?

[Ron]

I remember listening to a debate between Phil Fernandez and the Infidel Guy (I have it somewhere on mp3... I'll have to listen to it again).

Anyway, the Infidel Guy brought up this chicken-o-saurus with "Raptor-like" teeth. And Dr. Phil asked who's to say they're "Raptor-like" teeth. Why cannot raptors have "Chicken-like" teeth? I was cracking up

The whole thesis was based upon using "Raptor-like", as opposed to using "Snake-like" or "Reptile-like", or even "Chicken-like" to give the dinosaur-like connotation.

Now, we get a fuzzy picture. What's next? An artists interpretation????

[Javabean]

There was an article recently in one of those Scientific magazines you find on news stands that talked a lot about this. I need to see if I can find it. In it they talked about these teeth and other similar findings, such as the Chicken has the same number of vertebries in its tail that a t-rex has...

Here is just a quick link i found about it
dino-chickens!!!!!!

But seriously though I think the name of this thread would make an awesome children's book!

[Ron]

There was an article recently in one of those Scientific magazines you find on news stands that talked a lot about this.  I need to see if I can find it.  In it they talked about these teeth and other similar findings, such as the Chicken has the same number of vertebries in its tail that a t-rex has...

Here is just a quick link i found about it
dino-chickens!!!!!!

I wonder how many vertebra Big Foot has. And does he have more that the Chicken-o-sauris ?

But seriously though I think the name of this thread would make an awesome children's book!

[Ron]

As chickens, generally, don't have teeth what is a "chicken like tooth"?

If that chicken had teeth, then chickens do [in fact] have teeth. And were that the case, then it had chicken-like teeth.

As we have the fossils of Raptors AND their teeth, here: http://www.arizonask...saurus_Fossils/

And we have live lizards and snakes, and their teeth. Do they have lizard-like teeth (and snake-like teeth) or raptor-like teeth. And are you going to be highly presupposition-like and pretend they are.

Yeah, they can be sold they are that common!

Ah, the Frank-like connotation! Big foot track plasters are pretty common, and can be found for sale as well.

What type of "snake-like teeth"?  Fangs?  Reptile teeth?  Carnivore or Herbivore?

No, “Chicken-like” teeth.

Yup, "Raptor like teeth" is a very apt and descriptive visual aid for teeth on a chicken

Seems to me raptor-like teeth are extremely similar to some “snake-like teeth” and are therefore not that unique.

[Ron]

By the way, can you show me the teeth in the picture?



Or are they as prevalent as Big foot?

[CTD]

http://www.yourdicti...y.com/egg-tooth

egg tooth
a tooth-like structure on the nose or beak of young reptiles and birds used to break the egg membrane or shell at the time of hatching

[ikester7579]

Of course teeth in chicken don't "prove" evolution.  Evolution, like the Germ Theory of Disease, Quantum Gravity and any other Theory you wish to name will NEVER be proven.  Not the way Science works.

For "proofs", check out math.  No, this is NOT time wasting nor baiting or whatever.  If one is going to discuss science then use the terms and meaning science uses, not the common vernacular.

However as current Theory of the Avian/Dinosaur predicts, birds are direct descendants of dinos and we would expect vestigial parts showing up every now and again.

There are humans that grow double row teeth, what does that prove about where or what we descended from?

 double_row_teeth.jpg   2.88KB   4 downloads  double_row_teeth1.jpg   15.96KB   4 downloads

[Javabean]

There are humans that grow double row teeth, what does that prove about where or what we descended from?

It shows that not all children lose their baby teeth when the adult teeth come in. It's possible that it was fairly common in the olden days of the bible seeing they probably didn't have an equivalent to modern dentistry.

[Ron]

I like the way nobody has tried answering the questions. People have even implicated the originality of the photo. Make no mistake; these are teeth, albeit embryonic teeth, and they have associated jaw developments. Despite subjective assessments, they are actually most similar to archeosauran teeth; not snake or any other reptiles. Please at least read the paper, im willing to bet no one has.

Okay, I’ll ask again “Can you show me the teeth in the picture?”.


Just point them out so we can continue the discussion.

[CTD]

There are humans that grow double row teeth, what does that prove about where or what we descended from?

Sharks have multiple rows of teeth.

[ikester7579]

I like the way nobody has tried answering the questions. People have even implicated the originality of the photo. Make no mistake; these are teeth, albeit embryonic teeth, and they have associated jaw developments. Despite subjective assessments, they are actually most similar to archeosauran teeth; not snake or any other reptiles. Please at least read the paper, im willing to bet no one has.

Perhaps its because theres no possible comeback, theological or none, for YEC.
Nothing, having two (or more) sets of teeth is normal for mammals. What isnt a normal aspect of development, or so the various contradictory statements of YEC would have us believe, is having clearly derived traits from a different, unrelated "kind". Reptiles after their own kind, and so forth. Its not: "birds after their own kind, but with a few reptilian traits thrown in"

What does it all mean?????

All of this is in assuming that evolution is a true absolute fact, right? That is why any other explaination is rejected, so why should we bother? You will just say: God did it, right? So most here are not willing to fall into this trap.

Besides, concerning God and creation. What answer would you accept? Nothing, right? Asking questions that you are not really interested in hearing the answer to, can be considered wasting time.

This question is like me asking you were the matter and energy can from for the big bang, when matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed? To what point do I ask a question like that out right, and base a whole thread on it. Unless I'm planning on wasting everyones time?