Jump to content


Fossil Dating Fail

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
20 replies to this topic

#21 aelyn



  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 392 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Age: 30
  • no affiliation
  • Atheist
  • France

Posted 28 November 2012 - 06:23 PM

Not my area of expertise, but a question immediately comes to mind. How would you distinguish radiogenic Argon-40 from atmospheric Argon-40? I'm talking physically or chemically, not from a post de facto assumption that because of some other method also used the sample must be old enough for the Argon-40 to have been produced in place, therefore it must be radiogenic in origin.

Not my area of expertise either but off the top of my head Argon, let alone Argon-40, is a rare gas while Potassium (K, not Kr as I wrote in my previous post) is pretty common in rocks. At some point the amount of Potassium decayed into Argon-40 will be orders of magnitude larger than the atmospheric levels of Argon-40, so for any rock that has high Argon-40 concentrations most of that would be radiogenic, enough that the original concentration of Argon-40 from the atmosphere wouldn't cause more than a small error.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users