That was a tongue-in-cheek pun on the philosophy of Solipsism Arch... Don't worry, you'll get it eventually.
*face-palm* yeah okay I get it
If you are responding to me, then you (yourself) therefore defeated the argument for Solipsism. But, you can still deny that Solipsism is refuted by saying that I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t exist. But, in doing so, you again responded to me, and therefore defeated the argument for Solipsism once again. Your simply saying I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t exist doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t prove I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t exist, it just proves you are in denial.
Unless of course, I created you in my mind, and I am in fact only responding to my own questioning through you...Can you prove that you are not just a figment of my imagination?
Now, you can continue along the Solipsist line of illogic, but you will be doing so against ALL of the logical and empirical evidence amassed against you.
In other words, all youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll be able to do is (once again) equivocate.
Oh don't worry, I think the whole idea is pretty silly But I still don't think you have logically defeated the position, and that's what I'm interested in seeing. As silly as I think the notion is, I don't think it can be logically argued out of.