And who's stopping that?
When I say that an evolutionist lies when they say "science tries to falsify a theory" (in the context of evolution) or "if someone could falsify evolution they would be famous" is because an evolutionist *should* know that the Paluxy tracks are ripe for study (although the possibility remains that evolution may have to be revised... again).
Instead of the ICR doing their research in the court, to find a loophole to teach their religion as science, they can do it.
Yes, it is true that if the Paluxy Tracks had any value they'd be swarmed over. They are not, not even by Satari and the other "geologists". Why is that? Honestly it is that the tracks are frauds or tracks of dinosaurs with dinosaurs.
And that means YEC geologists are lacking in being able to put their own research paper together and doing research there!
You may have convinced yourself that there really isn't much interesting at Paluxy in regards to human tracks, so you aren't technically lying. However, since you *should* know there is something that should be studied at Paluxy if the two statements I quoted above are true, you are negligent at the very least.
Some YECs say Paluxy is real. There is no evidence but again it is not for those who think Santa is real and that the Navy has shown land at the North Pole. It is for those who make the claim to research it and publish it. Anything else shows the emptiness of those YECs who claim human tracks.
Things YECs have never done:
As to creationists having any good points: consistently flat geological layers, copying DNA should degrade messages and not make new coherent ones, and Haldane's dilemma are just a few of the very serious problems that you just showed you are ignoring. Good luck with your theory if you are going to keep an attitude like that!
Produce evidence that supports their idea (I will not even call it a hypothesis as YEC "science" makes no predictions) as science.
So how does one measure information in the genome again? Which organism has "more information", a species with 23 pairs or one that have 39 pairs?