You may well be, but most of my work is in National Defense and proprietary research and design. I also instruct in this arena, so donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t feel bad if I cannot (and will not) go into any detail to satiate your desires.
Really? What specifically?
Again, I am curious to know specifics.
Can you show me where I said such nonsense? This should be interestingÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ The true scirentific method either proves or disproves. positing time to prove your thesis is faith, not science.
You claim to work in science and yet you say something bizarre like this. Science does not prove anything - proofs are a mathematical formalism. Science strives for theories that explain observed phenomena - thats it
Ahhhh, theoretical applicationsÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ I see! You do understand that germ theory, electronics, GPS etcÃ¢â‚¬Â¦ Are provable here and now, and you can theoretically and practically apply them. But, you are using the excuse of black holes in an attempt to explain phenomena that you can only observe from a great distance (far outside the realm of the actual scientific method).
They are called black holes for a reason. And again, you obviously do not understand the philosophy of science. Black holes are extreme curved regions of space-time. In other words, they are theoretical objects that explain observable facts. I can show you the effects that black holes have on matter in its vicinity - but I cannot show you a black hole because you wouldn't be able to see it anyway. If science was restricted to only what could be seen with your eyes then germ theory, micro electronics (which depend on quantum mechanics), GPS, and many other things would never have come about.
The philosophy of science and the scientific method are applicable with phenomena that are tangible and applicable. Whereas black holes (which are yet to be empirically evidenced) can only be assumed. In other words, I can give you a great shock with electricity, or empirically prove gravity beyond all doubt. To the point that if you verbalize any doubt to their veracity, youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ll do so by denial and faith alone.
Therefore, you are basing your science on dogmatism and faith, not the scientific method.