I was surprised to find this one. http://www.ridgecres.../sage/v7i9n.htm
This one I add because there are some names but more because I think it might be an interesting read for you. In fact the site is one I have often refered to for research. The site seeks to prove through science and does not use faith based reasoning.http://www.ridgecres...sage/v5i10f.htm
Iowa State University astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, author of The Privileged Planet.
British Royal Society Official Resigns Over Creationism Controversy.
Michael Reiss, director of education at the Royal Society in London, resigned from his position last week after some comments he made were construed as being supportive of teaching creationism as science. Reiss said that "when teaching evolution, there is much to be said for allowing students to raise any doubts they have...[and] have a genuine discussion. The word Ã¢â‚¬â„¢genuineÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t mean that creationism or intelligent design deserve equal time." He also said that the approach to teaching evolution in this way depends on the "comfort of the teacher...I donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t believe that such teaching is easy." Despite his caveats, some British media outlets and scientists accused Reiss of advocating the teaching of creationism in science class, and the Royal Society subsequently put out a statement saying that Reiss resigned because his comments were "open to misinterpretation" which "has led to damage to the SocietyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s reputation." 1
Technically, he resigned. He wasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t really fired. But notice that he was Ã¢â‚¬Å“accusedÃ¢â‚¬Â of advocating the teaching of creationism, and that his comments damaged the SocietyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s reputation. And even though he tried to backpedal by saying that creationism doesnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t deserve equal time, he still had to go.
This was gleefully reported to all members of the AAAS, to assure them that any questioning of evolution would not be tolerated by the British Royal Society. It also conveyed the message that if any AAAS members were thinking of being so foolish as to express any doubts about the theory of evolution, it could happen to them.
There wasnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t even any kind of charade. They didnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t say Reiss resigned because he wanted to spend more time with his family, or he wanted to spend more time doing research. They admit he was forced to resign because he advocated academic freedom. He wanted students to be able to Ã¢â‚¬Å“raise doubtsÃ¢â‚¬Â and have a Ã¢â‚¬Å“genuine discussionÃ¢â‚¬Â about the theory of evolution.
Okay, I can keep tagging sites. They are out there, people once in the fields and now not able to be published. How many? I am not even going to specualte. Seems to me one is too many. I am confident from a short search that I will find dozens. I would not be surprised to find hundreds, thousands? I really can't say.