Posted 24 September 2010 - 08:26 PM
I'm not really here to debate evolution (as far as I'm concerned its pretty much fact).
What does get me though is the lies that creationists tell in order to sell their product. Kent H*vind, Ray Comfort, Duane Gish, and Ken Ham to name a few tell the same untruthes again and again despite the fact that they live in an age where its relatively easy to get access to the education they need.
So the reason why I'm here is to find out how creationists can continue to defend their position given that any reasonable person would instantly dismiss their claims were it not shrouded in the protective shield called religion.
Oh, and I'm an atheist if you hadn't guessed already
Posted 25 September 2010 - 12:43 AM
Perhaps you should pick a single example by one of those people and present your case against it. Also, it might be wise to proceed with the premise of it being an error or honest misunderstanding of the evidence rather that a deliberate lie.
Welcome to eft!
Posted 25 September 2010 - 05:19 AM
By the way; <this is a warning> .
Posted 28 September 2010 - 05:36 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users