Jump to content


Photo

Presuppositional Apologetics?


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Spectre

Spectre

    Philosopher

  • Moderator Team
  • PipPipPip
  • 577 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pensacola, FL
  • Age: 26
  • Christian
  • Creationist
  • Pensacola, FL

Posted 01 May 2011 - 12:24 PM

http://www.drdino.co...-1-foundations/

What do you all think? I have used it before and it is actually an effective form of apologetics.

This is Sye's site.


www.proofthatgodexists.org

#2 Ron

Ron

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6530 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Age: 50
  • Christian
  • Creationist
  • Johnstown, PA

Posted 02 May 2011 - 03:45 PM

Quite probably one of the best Presuppositional Apologests ever; and maybe even a better apologetic debater than William Lane Craig (And that's saying something):

http://www.theopedia.com/Greg_Bahnsen

http://english.turkc...om/Greg Bahnsen

http://www.youtube.com/gregbahnsen


Bahnsen a proponant of the Transcendental Argument for the proof of God, totally dismanteles Gordon Stein in the "Great Debate".


One of my favorite exchanges in the debate:

Dr. Bahnsen: Are all factual questions answered in the very same way?

Dr. Stein: No, they are not. They’re answered by the use of certain methods, though, that are the same - reason, logic, presenting evidence, and facts.

Dr. Bahnsen: All right. I heard you mention logical binds and logical self-contradictions in your speech. You did say that?

Dr. Stein: I used that phrase, yes.

Dr. Bahnsen: Do you believe there are laws of logic, then?

Dr. Stein: Absolutely.

Dr. Bahnsen: Are they universal?

Dr. Stein: They’re agreed upon by human beings. They aren’t laws that exist out in nature. They’re consensual.

Dr. Bahnsen: Are they simply conventions, then?

Dr. Stein: They are conventions, but they are conventions that are self-verifying.

Dr. Bahnsen: Are they sociological laws or laws of thought?

Dr. Stein: They are laws of thought which are interpreted by men and promulgated by men

Dr. Bahnsen: Are they material in nature?

Dr. Stein: How can a law be material?

Dr. Bahnsen: That’s a question I am going to ask you. Thank you!

Dr. Stein: I would say no

[MODERATOR: Dr. Stein, you now have an opportunity to cross-examine Dr. Bahnsen]

Dr. Stein: Dr. Bahnsen, would you call God material or immaterial?

Dr. Bahnsen: Immaterial.

Dr. Stein: What is something that is immaterial?

Dr. Bahnsen: Something not extended in space.

Dr. Stein: Can you give me an example of anything other than God that is immaterial?

Dr. Bahnsen: The laws of logic.

[AUDIENCE: (laughter and applause)]

[MODERATOR: Can I ask you to hold that down please?]



The transcript can be found here:
http://www.foranansw...Debate_v1.3.pdf


The mp3 can be found here:
http://veritasdomain...e-great-debate/

If you want to purchase a high quality recording of the debate (I have a cheaply recorded mp3 version, but I listen to it quite often):
http://www.pointsout...&Store_Code=ABS

#3 Spectre

Spectre

    Philosopher

  • Moderator Team
  • PipPipPip
  • 577 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pensacola, FL
  • Age: 26
  • Christian
  • Creationist
  • Pensacola, FL

Posted 02 May 2011 - 08:27 PM

Wow, that's good stuff. :lol:

#4 rico

rico

    Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPip
  • 602 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Jesus, computers, physics, video games, philosophy, epistomology
  • Age: 34
  • Christian
  • Young Earth Creationist
  • USA

Posted 22 November 2011 - 02:58 PM

Wow, that's good stuff. :lol:

I thought answers in genesis gave a good overview on their website today. http://www.answersin...s-of-persuasion
After I read some, haven't finished, I thought it was titled appropriately.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users