Listen here.
* Two Wild Claims by Whorton and Roberts: Real Science Friday co-hosts Fred Williams and Bob Enyart debunk two wild claims made in an old-earth book, "Holman QuickSource Guide to Understanding Creation" by Mark Whorton and Hill Roberts.
* Wild Claim #1: Flood Geology began with Ellen White and the Seventh Day Adventists.
* Wild Claim #2: Young earth creation, "requires one to regard virtually all of modern science as fundamentally mistaken... about most of the... principles that have made modern technologies possible."
June 3 2011 - What Technologies Needed Darwin Or An Old Earth?
Started by
Fred Williams
, Jun 04 2011 07:38 AM
1 reply to this topic
#1
Fred Williams
-
- Admin Team
-
- 2093 posts
Administrator / Forum Owner
- Gender:Male
- Location:Broomfield, Colorado
- Interests:I enjoy going to sporting events with my kids, especially Broncos games, and other Dad stuff (little league games, dance recitals, etc). I (used to) enjoy playing basketball. I also occasionally play keyboards for my church's praise team. I am a Senior Staff Firmware Engineer at Micron.
-
Age: 51
-
Christian
-
Young Earth Creationist
-
Broomfield, Colorado
Posted 04 June 2011 - 07:38 AM
#2
gilbo12345
-
- Veteran Member
-
- 2821 posts
Veteran Member
- Gender:Male
-
Interests:Currently studying Biotechnology, (the commercialisation of Biology into a novel product or service).
Enjoys games of tactics and strategy. -
Age: 25
-
(private)
-
Creationist
-
Australia
Posted 12 June 2011 - 11:01 AM
Listen here.
* Two Wild Claims by Whorton and Roberts: Real Science Friday co-hosts Fred Williams and Bob Enyart debunk two wild claims made in an old-earth book, "Holman QuickSource Guide to Understanding Creation" by Mark Whorton and Hill Roberts.
* Wild Claim #1: Flood Geology began with Ellen White and the Seventh Day Adventists.
* Wild Claim #2: Young earth creation, "requires one to regard virtually all of modern science as fundamentally mistaken... about most of the... principles that have made modern technologies possible."
I'm studying Biotechnology and I see no correlation of evolution / Darwinism to technological discoveries... In fact science is divided into two parts..
Pure science: The study of something for the sake of studying it.
Applied science: The study of something with which to create a new technology...
Evolutionary studies partake of the former type of science hence have no relevance to technology at all.
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
