Science ain't proof, mathematics is proof; so it is Benoit Mandelbrot who kilt god - of course, such a thing ain't possible.
I know a mathematician who can prove through math evolution would never be possible. And for that he is not longer welcome in scientific circles.
Scientific theory is validated by experimentation and by making testable predictions. The main gripe against creationism is in not being science, that it offers no predictive modeling.
The reason it makes no predictive modeling is:
1) What is their left to predict in the creation when the creation was created to reproduce after it's kind?
gen 1:11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit
after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
gen 1:12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed
after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself,
after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly,
after their kind, and every winged fowl
after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
gen 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature
after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the
earth after his kind: and it was so.
gen 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth
after his kind, and cattle
after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth
after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Now I know you will ask, what does kind mean? And I will say: Have birds ever been seen producing anything but birds? Do dogs produce anything besides their dog kind? Do lizards produce anything out of the lizard kind? Speciation is "almost" the medium step between micro and macro. But the step required for macro has never been observed and never will be. And claiming micro to infinity = macro because micro is a process of macro is only a cop out for macro being unobservable. And claiming micro and macro are the same thing is also a cop out for macro being unobservable.
2) What is there to predict when nothing has been observed changing past micro-evolution?
God has addressed this problem as well:
Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:
21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie,
and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Now what is it that changed the truth of God into a lie that also worships the creature more than the Creator? Evolution.
And who does this? Evolutionists and theistic evolutionist. Why are TEs included in this? A person cannot change the truth of God into a lie unless they knew the truth first. So that fits atheists-evolutionists that know what the word says, and TEs who also know what the word says.
Why are they without excuse as said in verse 20? Because they knew the truth but preferred the lie. And because the truth is known yet the lie is spoken it's like committing perjury in a court of law. There is no excuse for that.