That is the usual cop-out answer by some atheists who don’t actually take the time to find out what “Most” Creationists understand and/or know. Not only that, but yours is simply another prejudicial blanket statement and is basically an ‘Ad Hominem’ abusive (nothing more than mudslinging). These atheists often make this type of statement because they are either too lazy to find out what “most creationists” actually know, OR they have to actual argument to refute “most creationists” assertions.You can't unless you learn it and understand it. The problem most creationists have arguing against evolution is that they don't actually understand what it is, so that those of us that at least understand the basics, are left scratching our heads just wondering where on earth to start.
But my real question is how can I give arguments against Evolution?
You made the assertion; therefor it is incumbent upon YOU to:
1- Provide a definitive number for "Most Creationists" that supports your assertion.
2- Provide actual and factual evidence showing "Most Creationist" not understanding what evolution is (and not simply YOUR take on evolution).
3- Provide actual factual evidence (empirical scientific evidence to be precise) that proves YOUR take on evolution being correct.
Well, enlighten us, instead of instead of flinging accusations like broad swaths of paint on an artist’s canvas, with a brush that would be better served to apply paint the side of a barn. And, be courteous enough to specify if you are attempting to support micro or macro evolution (and please understand the difference between the two in your attempt).
Most of the time all you guys have is a bunch of misconceptions that don't resemble what the ToE is because all you've ever heard or read is from creationists web sites that, well, let's be tactful, are a bit wrong most of the time.
Quoting “the art of war”, although sometimes applicable, isn’t needed when you are simply slinging mud. I would suggest that you take your own advice. It would serve you better here.
Know your enemy and argue the facts from there.
don't see how someone is supposed to say that whale and horse evolution is false. In the video he showed there were skulls, knee caps, hip bones, and even a pelvis.
Being an independent, free thinking person, you'll consider the evidence you're presented with objectively and decide whether it holds water or not. Innocent until proven guilty remember.
Again, you’d be better served to act on your own advice…