Jump to content


Photo

Best Atheistic Minds... 119 Points Of Logical Fallacies

Hitchens Dawkins Dennet Harris

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
2 replies to this topic

#1 gilbo12345

gilbo12345

    Honorable Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5799 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Completed BBiotech (Honours)

    Currently studying Masters of Teaching.

    Enjoys games of tactics and strategy.
  • Age: 25
  • (private)
  • Creationist
  • Australia

Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:14 AM

I was surfing the net and found this great post going through a few of the logical fallacies employed by the top atheistic minds. Dawkins, Hitchens, Dennet and Harris.. However part 1 mainly goes through the fallacies employed by Dawkins and Hitchens.


http://www.bahaiphil.../articles/?p=38



It certainly was entertaining! 118 points were covered, (some points exposed 2 fallacies at once). This is only part 1 so there are more fallacies to be uncovered for those willing, (total is 180 points)...

All rights to the author Ian Kluge, his email address and information can be found via the link.

#2 Ron

Ron

    Advanced Member

  • Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 6530 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Age: 50
  • Christian
  • Creationist
  • Johnstown, PA

Posted 27 February 2012 - 05:46 AM

Excellent catch and post Gilbo… I’ll have to spend some time there, this could be a really good research resource.

#3 gilbo12345

gilbo12345

    Honorable Member

  • Veteran Member
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5799 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Completed BBiotech (Honours)

    Currently studying Masters of Teaching.

    Enjoys games of tactics and strategy.
  • Age: 25
  • (private)
  • Creationist
  • Australia

Posted 27 February 2012 - 07:37 AM

Excellent catch and post Gilbo… I’ll have to spend some time there, this could be a really good research resource.


Glad I could help spread the info Ron :D

I'll need to set some time aside to really go over it thoroughly, also there is a link to more articles by the author. I think there is one with his perspective on the "New Atheism" movement.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users