These are my ideas, just ideas
1. All the elements that are used for radioactive measuring of millions of years are metals.. Metals have a higher affinity for electricity, thus are more likely to be ionised first before the other elements...
That's not how metallicity or ionization works. Conductivity of metals is mostly a factor of the electron behavior in the outer uncompleted orbitals. Remember we are discussing removing all the electrons, not just the valence (outer layer) electrons. Once you strip the valence electrons, the leftover completed orbitals are extremely stable and similar to a noble gas configuration.
You may want to look up ionization energy. The more protons an atom has in it's nucleus the tighter it holds on to any given electron. A hydrogen atom takes 1312 kJ/mol to remove it's S1 electron. The same electron in a oxygen atom (non-metal) takes 84,078 kJ/mol to remove. The same electron in a potassium atom (metal) takes 476,061 kJ/mol to remove. Metalicity doesn't change the fact that it takes an enormous amount of energy to break apart completed orbitals, nor does it change the fact that the energy needed to fully strip all the electrons from rhenium would be enough to fully strip the electrons of any lighter atoms as well.
You can look at ionization energies here. For large atoms they only list the first couple energies.http://www.webelemen...dium/atoms.html
2. The global flood is claimed to be global and to cause the pressures required for this to occur.
However perhaps that should be an area of study I am sure no-one has studied that before.
There are plenty of maps of radiation levels around the world, you could also use cancer rate maps as a crude proxy for radiation levels. Neither show any unusual peaks or dips around fault lines. A possible exception would be cases where radon gas is released from underground.http://www.blackcats...RadMap/map.html
You can get a geiger counter and a piece of granite relatively cheaply if you want to test the idea yourself. Hit or apply pressure to the granite, see if the geiger counter clicks any more or less than normal.
3. As is said in the link labs have been able to create all the elements and their radioactive states via electricity, I would assume that electricity being used would reduce the amount of heat required.
An electronvolt is the energy gained by an electron as it moves across a potential of 1 volt. Electronvolts and temperature are equivalent when discussing particle physics. If you are using high voltage on atoms to energize electrons you are raising their temperature.The field of plasma physics deals with phenomena of electromagnetic nature that involve very high temperatures. It is customary to express temperature in electronvolts (eV) or kiloelectronvolts (keV), where 1 eV = 11605K
I feel I should also point out that there's no mention of the amount of current produced by earthquakes in the links you've provided. High voltage by itself is easy to produce (walk across a carpet on a dry day and you can build a charge of thousands of volts, Tesla coils can produce sparks of over a million volts). Labs use high voltage and high current in fusion "pinch" experiments like those that have been mentioned because voltage by itself won't cause fusion
4. How would you have "5 billions years of decay"... How is this quantified.. Remember a half life is dependent on the initial amount of the element.
The whole reason creationists argue for accelerated decay is because they acknowledge the need to account for billions of years of radioactive decay.
Isochron dating is independent of the initial amount. Other forms of radiometric dating rely on the chemical properties of the parent and daughter products to determine what events cause resets of the clocks. For example if the daughter product has a low vaporization point compared to the parent it will escape as gas when the containing rock melts while the parent will remain, this sets the initial daughter amount to zero or close to zero and means that any dating will show time since last melt. Uranium-lead dating relies on certain minerals being strongly exclusionary to the daughter product during crystallization, meaning most or all of the daughter product found inside these minerals will have been produced after the minerals formation.
5. This is also covered in the link.
The link suggests that all comets and meteorites originally came from earth. The problem is that the orbits of many of these objects are incompatible with originating from earth. For example, long period comets will travel much further from the earth/sun than the proposed initial speeds would allow. There's also still the problem of the moon having old dates. Since the bible says that the "lesser light" was created prior to the flood you can't say that the flood produced the moon. Since quartz isn't a major component of the moon's crust you can't use piezoelectric moonquakes to accelerate the dating there. Lightning doesn't exist on the moon either.