How Did 1St Being Generate Energy ?
Posted 29 April 2012 - 10:48 AM
I have a question I would like evolutionists to help me find an answer for.
As we know from the theories adopted by atheists that life started spontaneously on this planet and when the conditions were just right the 1st being came into existence,
Now it is common knowledge that life beings need energy to sustain themselves, how did that 1st being produce energy? after some thinking I could only find to possible answers but both of them contradict evolution.
1) That 1st being had a the same mechanism as we have now for changing solar, thermal or whatever sort of energy to the type of energy that life beings can sustain themselves with but it was very primitive and simple. Now this can not be because no matter how simple and primitive you make it, it is still quite complicated and can not pop up just like that, as it should take some generations to create such a thing.
2) That 1st being had some sort of mechanism that can generate energy on its own, which is also impossible because such a valuable mechanism can never be lost in evolution process.
Can anyone please explain if there is another rational possibility to answer this question?
Posted 29 April 2012 - 10:53 AM
Posted 29 April 2012 - 11:11 AM
Chemoautotrophs (or chemotrophic autotroph), (Gr: Chemo (χημία) = chemical, auto (αὐτός) = self, troph (τροφιά) = nourishment) in addition to deriving energy from chemical reactions, synthesize all necessary organic compounds from carbon dioxide. Chemoautotrophs use inorganic energy sources, such as hydrogen sulfide, elemental sulfur, ferrous iron, molecular hydrogen, and ammonia.
Now it says clearly here that it uses " inorganic energy sources" which I think means that it needs to change that sourced energy to use it, which also means that there is some type of mechanism to transform energy.
Correct me if I'm wrong please.
Edit: while I was posting you edited your posts so I missed the edeted part, pleas forgive me.
Posted 29 April 2012 - 11:31 AM
Posted 01 May 2012 - 01:51 AM
Yet both of these systems are irreducibly complex and thus cannot "evolve", since the "ancestor" of these systems is unknown.
Not sure how else you can answer the question?
Mohammed to answer your question there is no other explanation available. Yes it defies evolution, but that is reality. In order for the first cell to live it requires all of its systems, including energy systems, in place from the word Go.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users