Jump to content
Evolution Fairytale Forum

Cassiterides

Veteran Member
  • Content Count

    630
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Cassiterides

  • Rank
    Banned

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Previous Fields

  • What is your Gender?
    Male
  • How old are you?
    20
  • What is your affiliation/religion?
    Christian
  • What is your Worldview?
    Young Earth Creationist
  • Where do you live (i.e. Denver, Colorado)
    uk
  1. Cassiterides

    Now We Evolved From This?

    Ancient literature is filled with catastrophism.
  2. Cassiterides

    Redwood Trees Can Evolve Into Squid!

    Geode wrote the following: This statement is false, since Geode then pasted a fabricated script with inserted [laughter] in attempt to make it as if Stearns comments were not serious.
  3. Cassiterides

    Now We Evolved From This?

    Atleast try to make your lies coherent.
  4. Cassiterides

    Now We Evolved From This?

    And yet you link to evolutionist material, and a few posts up posted you agree with what Todd Wood believes: From Todd's blog: ''There is evidence for evolution, gobs and gobs of it.'' ''It is not just speculation or a faith choice or an assumption or a religion. It is a productive framework for lots of biological research, and it has amazing explanatory power. There is no conspiracy to hide the truth about the failure of evolution. There has really been no failure of evolution as a scientific theory. It works, and it works well.'' Also nowhere did i say on this forum Todd was an atheist. I said that on another forum, so it's quite clear you have followed me here from there. This also explains why when you arrived on this forum you pretty much stalked every thread i created or post i made. This is why i ended up originally blocking your posts. So clearly you are some kind of disgruntled evo/atheist who followed me here from another forum. Nice attempt to pose as a JW, i'll give you atleast that.
  5. Cassiterides

    Now We Evolved From This?

    So finally you have come out the closet and admitted your account is a fake. I knew you were an evolutionist/atheist all a long. From Todd's blog (who you now have openly admitted you support): ''Evolution is not a theory in crisis. It is not teetering on the verge of collapse. It has not failed as a scientific explanation. There is evidence for evolution, gobs and gobs of it. It is not just speculation or a faith choice or an assumption or a religion. It is a productive framework for lots of biological research, and it has amazing explanatory power. There is no conspiracy to hide the truth about the failure of evolution. There has really been no failure of evolution as a scientific theory. It works, and it works well.''
  6. Cassiterides

    Now We Evolved From This?

    Just to point out that the Baraminology Study Group (BSG) are actually evolutionists, not creationists. From Todd Wood's (one of the founders of BSG) blog: http://toddcwood.blogspot.com/2009/09/trut...-evolution.html ''Evolution is not a theory in crisis. It is not teetering on the verge of collapse. It has not failed as a scientific explanation. There is evidence for evolution.'' Creationists should be warned what Baraminology really is and the real agenda agenda behind it.
  7. Cassiterides

    Now We Evolved From This?

    As i said, evolutionists have failed for 150 years on how to define a species. This problem is so well known it has been added to wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species_problem Modern evolutionary biologists admit they don't know what a species is or how to define one.
  8. Cassiterides

    Creationism And Astrophysics.

    The earth is not the Earth. The earth capitalized in the sense of the planet or whole world only came about in the 14th century. The 'earth' described in Genesis is only the dry land (see Genesis 1: 9) - ''dry land (earth) appear''. The earth therefore is seperate from the water. This is one of the main reasons why i believe in creatio ex materia and also because contemplating nothing is impossible. I'll get back to you on your other points.
  9. Cassiterides

    Redwood Trees Can Evolve Into Squid!

    You wrote the following: Stearns did not laugh in the video though, the audience did. Maybe the audience found it funny, but there is no evidence Stearns did. From what this lecture actually shows is that Stearns believes squids evolved from trees.
  10. Cassiterides

    Now We Evolved From This?

    ''the rock record changes from non-existent to basic to complex as one progresses from the oldest rock at the bottom of the record to the younger rock at the top of the record. I'll ask again. How do you explain this?'' This is an incorrect statement. The most complex forms are found at the lowest strata, and nothing leading up to them. An example would be the trilobite, look up its complex eye. "And this situation has troubled everybody from the beginningâ€â€Âto have everything at the very opening of the drama. The curtain goes up [life-forms first appear in the Cambrian strata] and you have the players on the stage already, entirely in modern costumes." Norman Macbeth, Speech at Harvard University, September 24, 1983, quoted in L.D. Sunderland, Darwin’s Enigma (1988), p. 150.
  11. Cassiterides

    Redwood Trees Can Evolve Into Squid!

    Note how Geode is inserting [laughter] in the script to make it seem as if Dr. Stearns was joking about this. However this is not in the original script or from the lecture you can watch. But that's typical evolutionist dishonesty for you. Of course, evo's now can only resort to claiming this was a joke to play it down.
  12. Cassiterides

    Now We Evolved From This?

    As are all evolutionists, you have failed for over 150 years to be able to define what a species is. Charles Darwin: ‘‘... I was much struck how entirely vague and arbitrary is the distinction between species and varieties.’’ Henry Nicholson: ‘‘No term is more difficult to define than ‘‘species’’, and on no point are zoologists more divided than as to what should be understood by this word.’’ Ernst Mayr: ‘‘…Darwin failed to solve the problem indicated in the title of his work.’’
  13. Cassiterides

    Theory, Law, Fact - Do You Know What They Are?

    Interesting statement. Are you aware leading evolutionists themselves have actually admitted evolution is not observable and rests entirely on faith? Richard Dawkins: ‘‘Evolution... hasn't been observed while it's happening.’’ G. Ledyard Stebbins: ‘‘… the major steps of evolution have never been observed.’’ Stephen Jay Gould: ‘‘… evolutionary change requires too much time for direct observation'' All of these men are/were leading evolutionists and they admit evolution is not observable - therefore evolutionists have admitted themselves evolution is far from fact.
  14. Cassiterides

    Theory, Law, Fact - Do You Know What They Are?

    Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and the first website you linked to is not a dictionary source either but some evolutionist website attacking intelligent design. A few examples of actual dictionaries: The Chambers Dictionary Oxford English Dictionary (OED) Collins English Dictionary Your links where you are defining words are from anti-creationists sites and wikipedia not dictionaries.
  15. Cassiterides

    Now We Evolved From This?

    The front cover and early chapters. Which is based entirely on the assumption/faith 3.5 billion years has existed. Does he have a time machine?
×

Important Information

Our Terms