Jump to content
Evolution Fairytale Forum


Veteran Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Calypsis4 last won the day on June 4 2018

Calypsis4 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

639 Excellent

1 Follower

About Calypsis4

  • Rank
    Veteran Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Interests
    Retired science teacher with 26 yrs of experience: Biology, physical sciences, & physics.

Previous Fields

  • What is your Gender?
  • How old are you?
  • What is your affiliation/religion?
  • What is your Worldview?
    Young Earth Creationist
  • Where do you live (i.e. Denver, Colorado)
    Midwest, USA

Recent Profile Visitors

657 profile views
  1. Calypsis4

    Look What I Found!

    That's very good, brother. I am especially interested in what he said about the ZPE (zero point energy). I will look at this again soon.
  2. Calypsis4

    Look What I Found!

    That's 100% fine, Cal. This is very important to you and it is more than your right to become emotional over it. But, BK was inferring that we (me, piasan, Goku, popoi, etc.) are the "emotional" ones in this debate....which is obviously not true. Just tally up the insults by poster..... O.K. But if that is so then do you promote what you believe here on EFF like empty robots without feeling or passion or love for what you claim is the truth? i.e. No God, no purpose, & no ultimate reason for existence? Because if so, why bother? 'insults'; You let the moderators decide what an insult is.
  3. Calypsis4

    Look What I Found!

    my grand daddy, an honest to god religious ninja.yeah, i can say hard core fundamentalist. i only wished i gotten to know him better. Ha, ha, ha,ha, ha. Have a great day, fella.
  4. Calypsis4

    Look What I Found!

    Blitz: Goku said, "I did watch the video from Calypsis, and it is just a rehashing of Arp's quantized redshift and QSO ejection ideas, which have largely been rejected by the scientific community upon further analysis." Do you see how these liars trivialize the truth when they are confronted with it? It wasn't just Arp..... ....it was Tift, Cocke, Napier, Guthrie, Arp, Burbidge, Bell, McDiarmid, Comeau, Bajan & Ryabinkof et al, have all discovered red shift periodicities that fly directly in the face of the Big Bang nonsense. Arp also demonstrated with numerous examples of the red shift anomalies that the skeptics cannot account for. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift_quantization Take a look at this information and look especially at the paragraph entitled Modern Discourse and see that every time the cosmo evo's tried to tear down what those men found they replied with solid defense of their position. Wikipedia had to admit this...poor things. Their reply was pitifully weak at best. Goku's response is typical. Our counterparts not only dislike the truth that they are confronted with, they are allergic to it.
  5. Calypsis4

    Look What I Found!

    Blitz: My experience has been that when one party in a dialogue is engaged in frequent name calling and disparagement toward the opponent, it is the one doing the name calling that is most emotionally involved. So what? Let him put my name down as one of them. No one is going to come on this Christian/creationist website and blaspheme and deny the Word of the Living God like he has without me getting emotional.
  6. Calypsis4

    Look What I Found!

    Blitz... He doesn't care about evidence....not one bit of evidence that works so clearly against his belief in evolution. What you said about C14 content should be enough to convert even the most hardcore skeptic but we are not dealing with honest people.
  7. Calypsis4

    Look What I Found!

    be honest, how much respect would you have for a scientist if he talked like that?man, i don't know what to think. and i'm not even going to try to explain it. it seems the harder you think about the subject, the more involved and deeper it gets. incredible. I was and am being honest and nothing less. I didn't invent quantum theory but I recognize it's existence and relation to the truth's of God's Word. In my counseling over that last 30 years I have experienced the supernatural on countless occasions and I know that the spirit realm exists, ...both within the human soul and in nature. You said, "man. I don't know what to think." Yeah. I get you. That was one of the most honest statements I've ever read on this website. We may not agree on some things but I appreciate that remark so very much. It's almost like a breath of fresh air here on EFF. Ask God to reveal Himself to you. "And ye shall seek me, and find me, when ye shall search for me with all your heart." Jeremiah 29:13. You see, He did this for me years ago and all of my true Christian companions likewise. So He will do it for you, also. Just don't establish any rules for God to follow in order to reach you because that never works. Best wishes to you.
  8. Calypsis4

    Look What I Found!

    My fellow companions: Absurd. Why would I need to know how light originated to tell how long it takes that light to reach Earth any more than I would need to know how a car was invented to know how long the car takes to travel a certain distance at a given speed? That man is out of his mind. He, as a professing 'christian' trusts in nature rather than the Creator who made nature --------- and gave us His words telling us about it. What a contradictory mind he has! He claims that Jesus Christ was 'fully God' according to scripture (which we agree) but then denies that same Jesus who gave us several clear statements that Genesis is history! Adam, Eve, Abel, Noah, were all mentioned as HISTORY....in Jesus statements about them. Not one was suggested to be an allegorical figure. Look at this... quote: That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. Matthew 23:35. Jesus clearly tells us that Abel (the son of Adam) was actually killed by Cain and compares that murder to what the Jewish priests did to Zacharias in the temple. So Abel was a real person in real history and not an part of an allegorical tale. This plus several other direct statements by Christ Jesus our Lord reveal that piasan's position on the Bible and Genesis in particular....is a damnable lie. Secondly, piasan doesn't know just how far out the stars/galaxies are. The speed of light is not only not a constant it is not even consistent. He, along with most of those who believe Darwin over God, refuse the evidence that (1) the red shift is not consistently reliable about distance and (2) the quantized red shift of galaxies evidence flies in the face of cosmic evolution theories and it has monumental evidence that the universe expanded in identifiable increments in our ancient past (Tift/Cocke, Guthrie/Napier, Arp/Burbidge, Bell, etc.). Let's hear from Arp personally on that. I personally think we are wasting our time communicating with that, uh, hmm, very difficult man. Debate is a good thing....but there must be an end to debate eventually. P.S. quote: "Edwin Hubble, Halton Arp's mentor, had this to say about the redshift. "If the redshifts are a Doppler shift... the observations as they stand lead to the anomaly of a closed universe, curiously small and dense, and, it may be added, suspiciously young." "On the other hand, if redshifts are not Doppler effects, these anomalies disappear and the region observed appears as a small, homogeneous, but insignificant portion of the universe extended indefinitely both in space and time." From the video website above.
  9. Calypsis4

    Look What I Found!

    interesting observation.can you make the essentially same statement about ID? don't forget, information seems to play heavily in abiogenesis. don't worry goku, i'm scratching my head like everyone else. the real kicker is that science papers will edit out allusions to ID. and that's not all. what about the placebo effect and its ability to alter our genetic makeup? we already know that particle physics has a duality. the question seems to be the very same as that of creationists. what is the nature of this god/ duality. that's some interesting stuff, wouldn't you say? In quantum theory, light does have the dual nature. That is because all light comes from God and the Spirit of Christ is in all light just as His Spirit is in all true believers in Jesus Christ. Christ was BOTH God and man at the same time. He manifested BOTH natures in his actions: at times as man and at other times as GOD. Physical light, strangely enough, has the ability to 'know' when it is being measured and/or observed and it changes from waves to photons..........or photons to waves as the Lord sees fit. The question to the skeptics therefore is: "How can physical light possibly 'know' that it is being observed and react accordingly even in far distance places from that measurement? If light is merely physical then how can it 'know' anything in the first place? Christ is the light of the world; John 8:12 Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life. John also said: John 1:4 & 7 In him was life; and the life was the light of men....That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world. I offer this as token evidence that the written Word of God is true for these things were written long before scientists discovered the quantum properties of light. No one can see the physical world without light and no one will see heaven without the Light of Christ. Light is one of most mysterious and impossible things for evolutionists to explain. How could nothing produce .................anything(?) still less this thing we call light? Without God's Word we cannot know and there is no possible way to know how light originated. Those who differ with this need to explain that origin if they think they can.
  10. Calypsis4

    Polystrate Trees

    Well, well, well, the photo stuck....hope this is the end of that problem.
  11. Calypsis4

    Look What I Found!

    This was plagiarized from http://rationalargum...orsfysics3.html Plagiarism is intellectual dishonesty. Please refrain from plagiarism. I've seen YEC banned for it. Blitzking, my friend, you need to provide the source so our adversary will stop his bellyaching.
  12. Calypsis4

    Polystrate Trees

    Testing, testing, testing... Let's see if my illustrations from photbucket stick this time. This is the 1st one: Guess how old this paw print is in this U.S. Geological Survey photo. (Don't know how long it will stick. We will see).
  13. Calypsis4

    Look What I Found!

    Blitzking: "I still keep him in prayer.. He is as lost as any Atheist I have ever met and to be pitied and not scorned.. Satan has him right where he wants him.. The problem is, he continues to poison peoples minds and tries to Deconvert true fellow believers with lies." Thanks, brother. I do to.
  14. Calypsis4

    Look What I Found!

    exactly. if we were to lay out the facts of evolution, i believe we would find discrepancy after discrepancy. and like noble points out, the language of the modern synthesis is such that each concept supports each other. i believe this is one of the major reasons that noble, koonin, and others suggest a rewrite instead of an extension. you know, when thinking about the mechanics of the cell, no, this stuff didn't "just happen". and a person would be hard pressed indeed to show how the cell arose from a broth of chemicals. in my opinion, it will never happen. Thanks. That's good, clear thinking.

Important Information

Our Terms