Kairos2014

Hey y'all, Hope all is well. I watched an interesting youtube vid on John Ankerberg show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuWAUnQN1HQ Old earth vs Young earth. There were some very interesting and captivating responses from all of them. I wanted to see if you would of said anything different from what was spoken on the show? Also, I have a few questions: - Is John Ankerberg bias against young earth? - Does the genesis account truly support young or old earth in your opinion? - 35min Hugh Ross - "for ye number and length of six days, by what is set above, you may make ye first day as long as you please, and ye second day too." Did Issac Newton believed in old earth? Many thanks in advance

I think it more than reasonable to believe in a young earth.

Loving the response by Enoch and Gilbo, masterful. That "Who created GOD" argument use to puzzle me a bit but good to know our very own William Lane Craig and other Christian apologists have answered this.

Hey y'all, long time no see hope all is well. I was pondering on Evolution vs Creation and thought why the big bang is a theory? What scientific method would they use to be able to test the big bang or have I misunderstood? I thought it was more like a hypothesis then a theory. Thanks in advance

Thanks Enoch good to hear from you old friend. "Crocheting" lol. Ah I see. I was watching the Richards Dawkins vs John Lennox debate/dialogue and found it interesting when the big bang was mentioned a few times which led to me here to open it up.

Hey y'all, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergent_evolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speciation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microevolution I remember watching Kent H*vind's videos on this and led me to look up. Are there really a distinction between all three? They seem like a variation of the same type e.g. darwins observation on the finches?

I was implying to macroevolution being unscientific and the 3 above is observable. Isn't that what you were saying "..but I don't think they are "proof" of macroevolution."?

I always knew this was unscientific but sometimes the 3 above can be a little confusing. I think I get the difference now. Thanks

Wow! Praise the lord Jesus! You are the man 'Enoch 2021', you gave them a boozooka!! I read all your comments and noticed the ones who defend evolution only pick one or two lines to respond to and then hide away lol. I think evolution works the way; pop and hide, pop and hide. Hey Enoch, can you respond to my thread on Old Earth, and gap theory please: http://evolutionfairytale.com/forum/index.php?/topic/6491-old-earth-gap-theory/ I am having some problem understanding the Old Earth and Gap theory?

Hey y'all, I found this article and thought of the forum: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/03/080320120708.htm I find it bizarre how this creature has been unchanged, and interesting enough the Evolutionist. Did reptiles lived in the same era as dinosaurs? Or are they originally classed as a dinosaur (reptile) but Man called it a separate group? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reptile Noticed here "approx 8000yrs..they are evolving -- at a DNA level -- faster than any other animal yet examined.". Wow I wonder what happen to the slow process of millions of years? Why do evolutionists ignore the flood of noah so easily and the Holy Bible and the Lord GOD has been spot on right from the beginning?

Let's conclude the Lord GOD has been right from the beginning! Micro-Evo is all you can see and observed. Nice try mate! Nope. Gilbo, presented a really good argument. Science demands evidence but can't back their own Macro?

I always wondered why many scientists and non-scientists say "creationist have no credentials or not real scientist"? It has become a broken record of excuses they use these days. Hey Gilbo, I am curious to know the particular question you asked your Professor? Forgive me I have missed it. Thanks my friend

Yep, you can count me in as one who doesn't follow the pope. Damn those pics of idol worshiping taking it to a whole new level lol.

hahaha I did one here: I'm gonna use it now thanks my friend

This is one of my best threads I've followed so far Loving the comments here. To all the brothers holding the fort in Jesus name; Enoch, Caly, Adam, Bone, etc. Such an honor and inspiring to read your comments.

Faith - I couldn't of said it any better that was awesome with the business card intro. I notice this has become a common trace for most atheists/non-believers. I assume it is reading comprehension, correct? Let me try to demonstrate this further by this scripture: Matthew 6:24 "No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money." Some will never accept a different belief as their own because one can only love one and despise the other. One can say "I have read..." but despise it. Can you honestly say it was reading comprehension? How does one gain insight and truly understands the Holy Bible? Luke 17:20-21The Coming of the Kingdom of God "Once, on being asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, Jesus replied, “The coming of the kingdom of God is not something that can be observed, 21 nor will people say, ‘Here it is,’ or ‘There it is,’ because the kingdom of God is in your midst" Matthew 13:9-13 "Whoever has ears, let them hear.10 The disciples came to him and asked, “Why do you speak to the people in parables?”11 He replied, “Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them. 12 Whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them. 13 This is why I speak to them in parables:" Matthew 13:9-13 is also applying to all those who read the Holy Bible but never perceiving unless he is born again. A born again Christian inspired by the Holy Spirit can comprehend GOD's word (Holy Bible) a lot deeper. John 3:3 "Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again.[a]" The 12 disciples was already born-again in order to see thy Holy Truth since Christ was with them. It is still the same today for the Holy Spirit in our Lives.

Hi Rose, welcome You will enjoy the forum as much as I am. Happy journey!

I'm still a newbie here so welcome aboard!

"best evidence for evolution is actually the best evidence against it" and "It would make sense that a good evolutionist effort would be to show the transition to those unusual sea creatures." So true my friend very true.

Hey Adam, I was watching this video again and thought I'll ask this question. Around the 11.10min mark "You can lead a cow to water...". Dr. Berlinski brought up a good idea/analogy about the cow and whale transformation. If there was a period/time where one specie had to transform into another specie, wouldn't we see a lot more fossils dug up today? I'm not sure if that's how evolution suppose to work but if they had to transform then surely we should suspect a lot more fossils. 14.20mins Dr. Berlinski "To my my way of thinking, if Darwinian hypotheses are correct, it should suggest an enormous...of animals.....but at least it would put it in the ball park of a quantitative estimate...which has hardly ever done!"

Thanks, Dr Berlinski sounds quite intelligent. Kept me on my toes with his vocab.

Hey yall, Newbie here. I found this forum from another site when I was reading up the 'Pre-Flood Water Canopy'. At first, I didn't know what a Creationist was until AIG (Answers In Genesis - KEN HAM) 7yrs ago. I signed up here shortly after viewing the forum section under 'Questions for Any Creationist/Young Eather'. It caught my attention with the amount of knowledge a Creationist or WHO IS FOR GOD has. As you can see I don't have a background in Science, etc, so I mainly go off the word of GOD, and pray here and there. I am looking forward to learning on this forum. I am a born-again Christian, and I use AIG and (Got Questions.org) to look up a lot of the scriptures for a greater depth which I enjoy learning from as well as other bethren, fellowship, etc. I believe the HOLY BIBLE literally (I think that would make me a believer in a YOUNG EARTH), and have FAITH in the Lord Jesus who is our Creator. I also stumbled across a Creationist 'KENT H*vind'. I watched all his youtube videos, and was extremely impressed. Very unfortunate for Dr H*vind he is recently in jail (something to do with tax envasion - I still don't know the full story). I also watched the video debate in 2013 - KEN HAM vs BILL NYE. Was great to watch. I'm not really sure what's new in 2014 but surely looking to browse the forum for a lot of exciting topics

Thank you for the warm welcome