what if

the first link isn't available anymore but included the paper i quoted from which is here: https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Scott-Testimony.pdf it's a 12 page pdf and nowhere in those 12 pages is it mentioned there were 2 types of covid vaccines. covid 19 vaccines were mentioned but there was NO distinction between which type was being disgussed MRNA was specifically mention only once. the paper MAKES NO DISTINCTION AT ALL between them i've read the entire 12 pages and my original assessment of "nice misleading opinion you got there mr. Jake Scott" stands. opinion? the paper EXPRESSLY states: I (jake scott) should note that I am here in my personal capacity and the views I share reflect my own professional experience and analysis of the scientific evidence. personally i do not consider this as honest reporting. there are potentially serious risks associated with MRNA that DO NOT EXIST with conventional cultured vaccines. to claim these risks can be determined in the relatively short testing phase of covid mrna vaccines is either ignorance or a lie.

i've stated that covid will behave like every other "pandemic" this world has ever seen. even if left untreated it will come, it will take out its fair share of people, then it will disappear. check this: Pfizer makes an unusual enemy in $2 billion fight over unwanted COVID-19 vaccines. The drug giant has pursued European governments seeking to enforce pandemic-era contracts to buy billions of dollars’ worth of vaccines that haven’t yet been made and are no longer needed. Pfizer makes an unusual enemy in $2 billion fight over unwanted COVID-19 vaccines . . . haven't yet been made? and pfizer is SUING over it? it's more like PHFFFFT. THAT'S what you call greedy. the next question is, just how far will a company like that go? i can honestly see why the media would be afraid of losing pfizers advertising dollars.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/autos-hybrids/10-reasons-why-electric-cars-still-suck/ar-AA1g48W8?ocid=msedgdhp&cvid=e9bf45ba807644439f711a3bd12e9aac&ei=59 . Range Anxiety The average range of an electric vehicle in the USA is nearly 300 miles, much higher than the global average of roughly 200 miles. Charging Problems The Environmental Impact Lie The zero-emission lie is likely the main reason why EVs are bad. The zero tailpipe emissions claim is valid, but you must also account for the other damage an electric vehicle does. And we're not talking on a macro level. An electric car uses regular tires, and tires are a big polluter, especially for heavy cars that wear out their rubber more quickly. On a much larger level, we have to look at electricity generation. Unless your EV connects directly to a solar, wind, or hydro-powered station, it's having an environmental impact. Most of America's electricity comes from natural gas, nuclear, and coal. An EV's environmental credentials mean nothing when you still have to burn coal to run it. Manufacturers are using more renewable energy sources when producing cars, but several studies have shown that the EV production process emits more greenhouse gas than an equivalent ICE car. You all know what's coming next. A manufacturer requires lithium, nickel, cobalt, and several other metals to make EV batteries. Mining is a filthy and dangerous business, and it's unequivocally connected to battery production. You also need these metals to build charging stations. The Burning Issue EVs are not a bigger fire risk than gasoline-powered cars. It has been disproved many times over, even if you factor in the smaller pool of electric vehicles. The main issue is fighting an EV fire. The known and readily available methods for fighting fire don't work. You literally have to drown an EV to stop it from burning, and even that doesn't always work. In most cases, the fire department will douse an EV and keep it separated from other cars for a few days after the fire. Electricity Taxes At the moment, electric vehicles are still pretty nifty regarding taxes. The government will give you up to $7,500 if you buy the right electric car. These government incentives are a great way to get people to adopt electrification, but one could argue that governments shouldn't get involved in private enterprise. If that were the case, at least 50% of automakers would have died out during the Great Recession. Fair is fair, and all that. Our big question is what comes next, and we can already see it happening. The government currently takes a few cents in tax for every gallon of fuel you buy. That money is used for the upkeep of roads and infrastructure. Where will that money come from if several states get their way and ban ICE outright? Price And Longevity The average price of a new EV is currently around $64,000. The average purchase price of a new car (all cars, including electric vehicles) is $48,000. As you can see, there's a massive gap, and not even the Inflation Reduction Act's contribution helps. Infrastructure Woes This has become less of a problem now that Tesla appears to have won the charging wars. The NACS plug will likely be the standard going forward, giving more people access to Tesla's remarkable charging stations. And thanks to the government, billions will be spent expanding the grid. Stagnation Several manufacturers are still investing in combustion, hydrogen, and synthetic fuels. But these automakers are in short supply. For the most part, automakers have accepted the cards politicians have dealt them. This may lead to stagnation and a lack of innovation, though Hyundai is doing the most to make its electric vehicles enjoyable. Performance Problems Most electric vehicles are one-trick ponies. Note, we say most because there are exceptions like the Nevera, Battista, and, on the lower end, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N. Thanks to that well-known instant torque delivery, EVs are stupid fast in a straight line. But going from 0-60 mph in two seconds gets old quite quickly. If anything, we enjoy the acceleration from 50-70 mph even more. The primary issue is weight. EV Owners Electric car owners are one of the main reasons electric cars are bad. Nobody likes a smug person, and people don't want to be told what to do. Not all EV owners are bad. Some buy an EV for the same reasons we would - because a Mini Cooper Electric Hardtop is the most fun and efficient way to complete a 50-mile commute. It's as simple as that. But it gets annoying when EV ownership becomes cult-like, and we all know who we're talking about. Tesla fanboys are the worst, and their silly antics have led to several people disliking an EV based purely on not wanting to be associated with other owners.

Millions of cars are recalled after bursting into flames. More than 1.5 million vehicles have been recalled so far this year due to a risk of the car bursting into flames, even while turned off, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Over the last several months, drivers of certain Jeep Gladiators, Jeep Wranglers, Kia Tellurides and BMW 530e xDrives have been warned to park their vehicles away from other cars or buildings due to the risk of their car igniting. The warnings, known as “park outside” recalls, have become more frequent over the last few years as cars are built with more electronics – and face more trouble cooling down. In the first seven months of 2026 alone, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued 17 “park outside” campaigns. Jeff Ebsch, a North Dakota resident, knows what it’s like to experience the frightening moment a car suddenly erupts into flames. Late last year, he walked into his garage to find his 2022 Hyundai Santa Fe on fire – unbeknownst to him, the vehicle had a “park outside” recall on it, WDay RadioNow reported. Ebsch isn’t the only one who has faced that type of danger, and likely will not be the last. The “park outside” recalls are meant to warn drivers of what are referred to as “key-off fires,” Frank Borris, a former National Highway Traffic Safety Administration investigator, told the Washington Post. Millions of cars are recalled after bursting into flames i've never heard of an ICE car bursting into flames with the ignition in the off position. in my opinion this sounds like a design flaw rather than some inherent property of battery vehicles. smaller gauge wire and more effective heat sinking will eliminate a lot of this. (smaller gauge equals a larger wire diameter).

goku said: i would say it sometimes doesn't get things right. sometimes it completely misunderstands your prompt. in this case rewording your prompt might correct the situation. did you read the dialog about the cell being a statistical analyst and the nature of randomness in regards to the eukaryote cell? i've noticed this too. sometimes its answers are verbose, sometimes its answers are only like 3 sentences. there are a few topics AI refuses to discuss at all. correct. the current state of the art requires AI to be retrained in order to acquire new data. in my opinion an AI can be trained on acquiring new data given the context of the data sought. once this is achieved then AI will become the repository of human knowledge.

made with ai: 2 hours worth of Psychedelic Western Rock. one of the comments was: if nevada had a soundtrack, it would be this.

i think koonin iterated something similar when he mentioned the arrival of life is "a seeming miracle". this alone should be an indication of just how complex the cell is. reproduction is just one part of cellular operations and it's not the important part. the regulatory system is the brains of the cell. through my various chats with gpt i've managed to come up with a simple one sentence description of the eukaryote cell, which i've included in my signature.

It’s laughably easy to poison open-weight AI models, researcher finds. Good news, everyone: “open-weight” AI models that are available to anyone to download and run are comically easy to poison. Katie Paxton-Fear, a cybersecurity researcher at Semgrep, demonstrated this in an attack that took less than an hour and cost less than $100 to carry out, The Register reports, successfully manipulating the AI’s behavior by feeding it malicious data. By training the model on just ten examples of poisoned material, the model started churning out new code that’s exposed to remote code execution, a vulnerability that allows hackers to run code on a person’s machine. “I did a proper backdoor,” she triumphantly shared on social media. Backdoors are a particularly dangerous type of attack that involves training an AI in a way that introduces hidden phrases into the underlying model. A hacker can use these to quietly trigger the model into carrying out a specific action, lying dormant and unseen until they’re called into action. Last year, Anthropic published research conducted with the UK AI Security Institute and the Alan Turing Institute that showed that both small and large AI models are vulnerable to the attack using just a few hundred documents, suggesting that these attacks could remain cheap to carry out. The findings will throw some cold water on the enthusiasm around open-weight models, which are praised for the control and transparency they provide over closed sourced models that run chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude, as well as their lower cost to use. But while their parameters may be visible, open-weight models don’t reveal their training data or their code — meaning they can still be black boxes to security researchers. “Even when model weights are public (‘open weight’), we have almost no ability to predict its behavior,” Paxton-Fear’s colleagues at Semrep wrote in a post last week. “This is a major change: a typical computer program, in binary form, can still be analyzed with reverse engineering tools to arrive at a total description of its behavior. With models, we have nowhere close to this capability.” Moreover, this is all fairly uncharted waters in cybersecurity. LLMs are incredibly complex and still new, so it’s difficult to uncover sophisticated attacks. And AI models can be compromised in much more subtle ways than software. “If a software dependency contains malicious code, we have mature practices for discovering it, tracking its provenance, and reducing its impact,” the Semgrup researchers argued. “AI models are different. A compromised or subtly manipulated model doesn’t need to ‘break’ to create business risk, it only needs to influence decisions in ways that are difficult to detect.” “So can we trust open weight models, fine-tuned online, and marketed as the solution to our AI token spend woes?” Paxton-Fear asked in a thread sharing her findings. “Well, we probably need something better than benchmarks and ‘and don’t write any insecure code.'” It’s laughably easy to poison open-weight AI models, researcher finds keep in mind this isn't "ai gone rogue", it's a DIRECT result of how the ai was trained and how it was used. BOTH are the DIRECT result of human actions.

i swear, it doesn't get any crazier than this: Illegal immigrant who murdered Michigan woman sues Trump, demands $75M, public apology, US citizenship. An illegal immigrant serving a lengthy prison sentence for the murder of a Michigan woman is suing President Donald Trump, alleging he faced humiliation when his case was used as a political talking point, and is demanding $75 million, a public apology, and U.S. citizenship. Brandon Ortiz-Vite, 27, who was previously deported from the United States, is serving a sentence of 39 to 102 years in prison for killing Ruby Garcia in March 2024. Illegal immigrant who murdered Michigan woman sues Trump, demands $75M, public apology, US citizenship

Story by Thalia Oosthuizen . . . New Cars Can Report Dangerous Driving Automatically. Most people are surprised to learn this, but many modern vehicles have advanced technology that allows vehicle owners to review data on things such as how fast they drive, hard braking, and collisions. Some share it with insurance companies or emergency services after a crash. You don’t have to opt in for all of it. Your driving habits are not as private as they used to be. Knowing this may change the way you view aggressive driving. Safe driving protects more than just your safety. - MSN providing "snapshots" doesn't supply context. what is seen as "aggressive driving" can EASILY be entirely irrelevant. this reminds me of how insurance companies . . . nevermind.

i already knew that just by the video title, that's why i didn't watch it. as it stands now, HUMANS are the threat, not ai. ai is only a tool (like your hammer) and that's ALL it is. a perfect example of what i'm talking about is this :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wX8CS85gWnA the title reads : karoline leavitt storms out of press briefing after being corned, published by Times Now - Times Now News channel examines news with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the Get Breaking news, the Latest news, Politics news, of the day. Times Network houses upscale television channels. the problem is, karoline doesn't storm out of ANYTHING. the video is over 2 hours in length but it repeats the first 30 minutes 4 times. IOW this is a video generated by ai with ZERO human oversight. yay rah the MEDIA ! ! at least try to get your facts straight BEFORE going bsc.

yes, and it's for those people i made my post. i will say this, at the current state of the technology it's highly unlikely that ai will EVER achieve true humanity. human morality is probably the only thing that kept us from destroying ourselves and ai HAS NONE. yes, we can give ai a "simulated morality" but the caveat here is a simulation CANNOT simulate the unknown.

the video title reads: China's New Female Robot Just Hit The Market And It Is 92% Human. it doesn't even merit 1%. it's exactly ZERO percent human. like i mentioned in an earlier post, ai is going to give robotics astounding abilities and it's going to be next to impossible to keep a firm grasp on what we are dealing with, which is little more that a box of rocks with a bit of programming. i promise you, this robot china has created CANNOT navigate its environment with intent. so much for being "human", aye? if you told that bot "help me put this couch in the back of my truck" it would simply just stand there like the idiot it is. 24 minute video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzVvn8wxj2Y P.S. one of the comments said this: "that video could be condensed to 2 minutes."

regardless of all of that, that black man demonstrated why all of these illegals are being rounded up and deported. i WOULD NOT want to live in a community full of his kind. what did DHS call them again? depraved monsters? now i get to hear all about how "bigoted" and "racist" i am. like i said earlier, some do indeed have a "good heart" but the fact still remains, they are here illegally and they know it and they need to be deported.

exactly. that was the entire intent of that black man, to intimidate you (ben) and to keep others from saying anything. his rhetoric does nothing other than to reinforce bens argument and he doesn't even realize it. especially when it comes to centuries old history. yes, britain has done some horrific things in its quest to secure resources but i would like to think britain today is tad more enlightened than their 400 year old grand daddies. moreover, this isn't "just a british issue" it applies to the u.s. as well. unfortunately you can't discuss the issue without appearing racist or bigoted and it's this right here is what the fuel is. any attempts to solve it provides the needed fuel that drives it.

that protester said "who started it". my response would have been: "it sounds like you want to start a conflict, NOT to resolve anything". IOW it's a way to divide people, a way to keep them from forming a unified front. using that protesters rhetoric we can assume they are looking to "conquer" great britain which by all rights would give YOU every reason for wanting them out of there. ah yes, the mind of a small man indeed. yeah, you're some big black bag of (word filtered). BTW, that protester probably came from haiti if the truth was known. haitians are known for its violence. i don't feel sorry at all for ANYONE in that new jersey jail. no, jails aren't pretty nor should they be. as a matter of fact, the fear of going to jail is probably the number one reason most people don't commit crimes, and these nutsack lefties wants to GET RID OF THEM.

i don't even like discussing it because it makes me rip snort too much. it positively makes me physically ill. the u.s. government knew who the rat pack was/ is back in 2001. i honestly dread the dems regaining control of the white house. NWO? it's probably closer than any of us realize i don't know about europe but america has become decidedly fractured over the course of the last 20 years. i also think it could be an honest effort to fix a problem that has been propagandized. such is the state of politics. i once said "politics is what nightmares are made of" and "politics causes brain rot".

let's get a minor point cleared up here. there are indeed "illegal immigrants" that are on the "right side" of things. this is EXACTLY why the patriot act was enacted in the united states, to track, capture, and eliminate these international trouble makers. thanks to democrats, this piece of legislation has been thoroughly gutted. it's also the reason behind the mess we have now, democrats doing everything they can to stop ice agents from doing their jobs. this of course floods our courts which in turn increases the amount of time an illegal is held in detention. yes, yes, yes, we all know they din do nuffin. the female in pink completely misses the point. it isn't because they are illegal immigrants, it's because they shouldn't be here in the first place. here in america illegal immigration used to be felony offense, a major crime in itself. not anymore, thanks to the squatters that called itself the biden administration, the very same administration that held negotiations with the goons that burned and looted our cities, BLM. sometimes i wished i lived in japan but i'm not sure i would like it very much. i would essentially be considered like something offensive sort of like carrying a dildo around in church. few realize just how racist the japanese actually are. they are so racist they don't even like those that look asian like the chinese and koreans. that's one of the reasons their crime rate is so low, lack of immigration.

thanks to sherman i've ran across an interesting web page, a VERY interesting web page. https://naprotechnology.com/ check this out: One of Dr. Hilgers’ pivotal discoveries is the standardized observation of menstrual and fertility cycles. Women chart with the Creighton Model FertilityCare System for gynecologic health maintenance, and couples use it to achieve or avoid pregnancy. Trained physicians can read a woman’s CrMS chart universally — this is the key to unraveling the mysteries of the menstrual and fertility cycle. -ibid you'll notice the article uses "woman" and "women" synonymous with FEMALES. it's IMPOSSIBLE for a "transgender woman (mab)" to get pregnant. maybe the left needs to murder a few more kirks and others and dox more doctors. kirk wasn't "spreading hate", he was simply voicing the truth about the matter. a truth somebody doesn't want you to know. YWNBAF, get over it. something else i want to mention is i asked my doctor the following question "if a transgender came to you for diagnosis and/ or treatment, how would you treat that person, by what they claim to be or by their biological make up"? my doctor said "interesting question". surely any doctor would know to treat the person by their biology, not by any subjective "feeling" they might have. i'm almost positive the above website will get hate mail, how naprotechnology.com is a pack of transphobic haters.

added to that, does a doctor actually condone such a thing. does a doctor look at a 6 foot 100 pounder and say "you look great !"? no, a doctor is going to tell you "you need to gain weight". you know, the exact opposite of what the anorexic wants. this transidiocy is sowing the seeds to put a stop to even THAT. there is a reason the transgender ideologues wanted to ban "when harry became sally". and like the books i've already mentioned, no one has zoomed in here and explained how they got it wrong. also, there's a significant discrepancy between mab and fab detransitioners i haven't been able to reconcile, and i highly suspect it has something to do with motives.

i refuse to discuss ANYTHING with a moron that doesn't want to look at the evidence. "yeah but i got the proof", right? wrong. 100% wrong homeboy. i would have "the proof" too if i relied on subjective opinion and shifting goalposts. it's the exact same method used by evolutionists for the past 150 years. honestly? you and those like you DESERVE PRISON TIME for arguing this agenda for children. probably the greatest medical travesty since the dawn of medical history. BEWARE. this issue is NOT as medically settled as popoi suggests. it's IMPERATIVE to get your mental issues in hand BEFORE you even THINK about this "transgender" nonsense. i'm not like popoi. i WILL NOT send you down a road of regrets over unsettled science. but, if you (as an adult) wanna go then go for it but don't blame me because you aren't really happy afterwards. YWNBAF, get over it and STOP demanding rights to which YOU ARE NOT entitled. i ain't man enough to win a gold medal, i gotta steal it from a female . . . LOSER.

like i said, it's a front row seat to the evolution debate of the past 150 years.

popoi says: So? Why should we care about genetics? https://evolutionfairytale.com/forum/index.php?/topic/6989-good-evidence-of-fraud-in-the-2020-us-election/&page=738 apparently you do or you wouldn't try to sneak in assigned. what you THINK you are is an entirely different matter. do you think a minor is capable of making such a decision? johns hopkins elected to NOT perform surgery for a reason popoi. if the truth was known, there were more than a few that lost their jobs over this nonsense. that's right, IT'S DEVELOPMENTAL. i would imagine a large part is social, that's why you feel the need to change society. and for what? fringe elements?

i've posted ways to get around this and popoi KNOWS FOR A FACT ai does NOT "always agree". how do i know he knows? HE SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED IT. oops.

the evidence exists mike, gpt specifically asked me if i want gpt to provide it. i answered no because i need to limit my dialog with gpt because of "time out" limits. i also presented a video a few pages back that discussed this same exact issue that was being discussed by SWEDISH. the crappy record keeping has been noted in that video, by littman, by gpt, and by the cass review. he's simply ticked off because countries that are receptive of this gender affirming method the u.s. is following IS NOT the way to go. he also doesn't want to acknowledge this agenda is in a state of flux where "standards" don't actually exist. gpt, littman, and the cass review mentions that too. trust popoi? NEVER. when someone EXPLICITLY states "your past experiences don't inform your future decisions" you KNOW you are dealing with an airhead. when the definition was changed in DSM 5 not a SINGLE SCRAP of research was mentioned in regards to that redefinition. the main reasons for the redefinition was to reduce stigma and to allow these people access to the drugs they "needed". all of the evidence can be explained easily, simply by acknowledging the state of flux this issue is currently in but popoi doesn't even want to do THAT. and lastly, there is simply ZERO evidence "you are born that way". every piece of evidence i've seen says it's a LEARNED behavior, something else popoi has vehemently denied until he couldn't deny it anymore. popois stand is "if a person says they are trans then they are trans and there's no need to try to convince them otherwise". in fact, popois side has even OUTLAWED (in 25 states) any attempt at doing just that. a doctor in one of those states can possibly go to jail if they tell you "i can't actually change you into the opposite s@x". scandinavian research shows this IS NOT the way to go, which decimates popois stand, and he simply can't stand it. he should change his name to spin doctor because he's an expert at it.