Jump to content
Evolution Fairytale Forum

Dredge

Advanced member
  • Content Count

    84
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Dredge

  1. Dredge

    Atheists: Is Murder Acceptable With You?

    Pierre-P. Grasse: "Assuming that the Darwinian hypothesis ... [paleontologists then] interpret fossil data according to it .... The error in their method is obvious."
  2. "In fact, over the past 100 years, almost all of biology has proceeded independent of evolution, except evolutionary biology itself. Molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, have not taken evolution into account at all." - Dr. Marc Kirschner, chairman of the Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School
  3. ... yet another Darwinist desperating trying to sqeeze the the La La Land of evolutionary theory with reality. This is what I've noticed about evolutionists: They seem to all have the utmost difficulty in telling the difference between an academic exercise and applied science (ie, reality). Since evolutionary theory appears to "explain" certain observations, evolution must be true. It really is a bizarre phenomenom - and it's due to the fact that they've been thoroughly brainwashed to believe Dobzhansky's Delusion that "nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution". They're oblivious to the fact that they're victims of the greatest hoax in the history of mankind.
  4. This is an example of a Darwinist being unable to tell the difference between paper-science and reality. The medical professional isn't interested in some useless atheist fantasy about how the human brain came into existence; it's only interested in what is there [qs]now[/i]and how it functions now. As for neuropsychology, the mind boggles as to how the "information" that we evolved from fish and primates could possibly enhance the psychological well-being health of any human being.
  5. Well, back in the days when the superstition of spontaneous generation reigned it would have been easy for a non-creationist to believe that life started as simple life-forms. But along came the electron microscope and other advances in microbiology that blew that fairy tale out of the water. If you ask me, evolution is everything to do with atheism! It's an atheist creation story that is dogmatically imposed on the public in the name of science. The cult of Darwinism gets away with this mendacious sham because atheists long ago hijacked the science of biology and other areas of science, such as geology.
  6. Dredge

    Atheists: Is Murder Acceptable With You?

    Exactly, there's no reason to accept the double standard except; "believe it because we believe evolution happened", revealing that macro evolution for that scenario is nothing more than an argument from credulity; "I believe it did happen that way against any facts by faith, therefore it did." (read my signature, it will tell you.) Once creation is rejected as a possibility, one really has no alternative but to accept the general theory of evolution; it is the only "plausible explanation" out there in Godless World. The miracle of creation (which requires faith) is replaced by the magic of abiogenesis/evolution (which requires faith).
  7. Dredge

    Atheists: Is Murder Acceptable With You?

    Tee hee ... that's such a silly story! Imagine if there were people who actually believed that to be true ... and imagine if they called it a scientific fact!
  8. Can you elaborate on this a bit, please? Sounds interesting. (I would argue that a theory of evolution was an inevitable consequence of the cult of atheism that emerged from the so-called Enlightenment, but this probably not what you mean.)
  9. You don't have to know what a "cultural Marxist" is to be one - all you have to do is conform to the Zeitgeist of Western civilization. You're right, I'm definitely not politically correct. Political correctness is a manifestation of cultural Marxism. I didn't know exactly what a "white nationalist" is, but having looked it up, I would say some of my views are consistent with "white nationalism". But having said that, I have no truck with the anti-Semitic aspect of the Far Right, especially since I am part-Jewish. I also believe the Jews and the nation of Israel play very important roles in God's plan for humanity. I have had friends of all races, but I believe there are "natural barriers" between the races that can't be ignored and will never be eradicated.
  10. Dredge

    Darwin's Glaring Omission

    Currently, scientists think life formed on Earth relatively quickly after the Earth cooled from heat released from accretion during the plant's formation; in the blink of an eye in terms of geological time scales. Some scientists say life formed up to 50 separate times. Each time it was destroyed during massive asteroid impacts that sterilized the young planet Earth until the early solar system 'calmed down' so to speak, and asteroid impacts were less frequent and less devastating allowing the life formed on Earth to flourish. When humans start guessing about what happened billions of years ago, I just tune out. It's all boring science-fiction to me.
  11. The only practically useful aspect of Darwin's theory is natural selection; the rest (the Tree of life/Common Descent), does nothing more than provide cozy bedtime stories for atheists. And it's highly likely that the principle of natural selection would have found it's way into the science of biology via one of Darwin's contemporaries, Alfred Wallace. This suggests to me that, had no one had ever heard of Charles Darwin and his whacko theory, biology would be none the poorer today. So Charlie D is seriously overrated, imo.
  12. Does the "Out of Africa" theory mean white people evolved from negroes? The biological theory of out of Africa does mean that we are all originally from Africa and thus white skinned people evolved from dark skinned people, yes, but your language, lol. I assume you don't know how racist that sounds in the 21st century. I'm not a follower of the religion of Cultural Marxism, so I don't consider the word "negro" to be racist. Since the word is derived from the Latin word for "black", it is no more racist that calling a black man, "black", or a white man, "white". If it was good enough for Martin Luther King to use "negro", then it's good enough for me. Let me guess, you consider "eskimo" to be a racist term as well; and like any good neo-Marxist, you probably don't have a problem with white people sometimes being referred to as "white trash".
  13. Does the "Out of Africa" theory mean white people evolved from negroes?
  14. Dredge

    Atheists: Is Murder Acceptable With You?

    Atheists are experts at making huge leaps - that's how they can accept the absurdly massive extrapolations that Darwinism depends on.
  15. Dredge

    Atheists: Is Murder Acceptable With You?

    Important to whom? Irrelevant to whom? Worth more to whom? These are all subjective questions that evolution can't really speak to, other than possibly to explain how we as humans came to consider other humans more important than rocks.Because humans tend to think of individual humans as worth more than most bacteria, we construct our morality on that basis. Bacteria might disagree if they had the capacity to do so, and if they did we wouldn't really be able to resolve that disagreement with proof, since it's a conflict that goes down to fundamentally subjective questions about what we value and why.As far as I can ascertain, evolution implies that the only difference between a human being and a bug is functional complexity. The fact that humans can imagine that their lives are meaningful doesn't change the evolutionary "fact" that they are just a more complex version of a bug. As one "clear-thinking" atheist once told me, "We're just grubs."
  16. There seems to be some confusion, usually old-earth creationists believe in a Billions year old universe.Typically <6000 years is called young-earth creation. You're free to use whatever label you decide of course. What do you see as a young-earth creationist? I believe life was created on earth about 5778 years ago, but that the earth existed before that for a period of time that is unknown to me.
  17. Greetings to all. I've been on several atheism-centric forums to discuss ToE, but I tired of the abuse and the bizarre aversion to rational thinking. So I thought I'd head for friendlier and saner waters. When I came across Evolution Fairytale I thought it sounded right up my alley. I am Roman Catholic and an old-earth creationist - however, I would like to make it very clear that I am definitely NOT a theistic evolutionist! I believe that the Lord created all life on earth in six days (each of 24-hours duration), about 5778 years ago. I regard theistic evolution as a heresy, since evolution is totally incompatible with, and makes a mockery of, Holy Scripture. If the truth of the Genesis account of creation can be thrown into doubt, then the entire Bible can be thrown into doubt. Whom should a Christian believe - the Word of God, or a bunch of deluded atheist pseudo-scientists? Surely, the wise man will choose the former and the only a fool will choose the latter. I also believe that the theory of evolution is not only the greatest hoax in the history of mankind, but is demonically inspired - to promote atheism and to blind mankind to the truth and light of Christ and the Gospel. Sadly, many of my fellow Catholics are theistic evolutionists, but as a model of how a true Catholic should regard ToE, I highly recommend the anti-evolution writings of the late Catholic intellectual, Paula Haigh (eg, Thirty Theses Against Theistic Evolution). I would also like to mention that although many high-ranking Catholics are theistic evolutionists, Catholics are free to totally reject ToE and believe in a literal interpretation of Genesis 1 - as many of them do.
  18. Evolutionary principles are used to inform prioritization when conservationists consider dwindelling populations. In a general sense common ancestry implied common genetic material - it's discovery has widespread medical applications. I will have to do some homework on your first example. But what you call evolutionary principles are probably scientific principles that have nothing to do with Darwinism. Chances are, they have been labelled "evolutionary", because that is the wont of the Darwinist cult that has hijacked the science of biology - they have re-dinfined biology's terminology in their own image. Such word-games are all part of the indoctrination process employed by Darwinists to create the illusion that "evolution is the unifying concept of biology". (An example: Darwinists say, "Bacteria evolve resistance to antibiotics", but the medical profession (ie, the real world outside the cult) says, "Bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics.") Re your second example (which is a tad vague), I will bet my bottom dollar that what you are referring to is an example of microevolution that is not dependant in any way on Darwinism to be understood and applied, and would have been discovered if no one had ever heard of Charles Darwin and his theory. This process of discovering, understanding and applying is called biology and, in my opinion, it can function perfectly well without any input whatsoever from Darwinism.
  19. Dredge

    Atheists: Is Murder Acceptable With You?

    "Neither Darwin nor Hitler would be considered experts on the theory of evolution nowadays.Hahah... You still dont get it do you.. There IS NO SUCH THING as an "Expert" in the "Theory of Evolution" because THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS EVOLUTION"!!! (Merely Variation and Adaptation followed by mass amounts extrapolation and imagination..) That is like claiming one can be an "Expert" in the benefits of Eating Dogmess or an "Expert" in Santa's Methodology for delivering presents to all on Christmas eve or an "Expert" in how the Terminator was able to travel back in time to save Sarah Connor.. There are a many "Experts" on the fraud of Darwin's Mindless MYO Mud to Man Myth, but they all have one thing in common.. They all know that there is NO SUCH THING AS EVOLUTION.. You have merely been brainwashed and indoctrinated into believing that there is.. Don't you remember the name of this website you are on now? Snap out if it..!! I once met someone who claimed to be an expert on the Tooth Fairy, but I didn't believe him.
  20. Dredge

    Atheists: Is Murder Acceptable With You?

    Please demonstrate that it cannot have meaning. If not you're presenting a bare assessment fallacy.How is this thought?: If you come from nothing and go back to nothing, you are nothing.
  21. Attempting to explain an observation with a theory is not my idea of a practical use. In the cult of Darwinsim, theorising about how evolution supposedly explains observations is considered "useful" - which apparently means ToE is a "fact". Sorry, I'm not that easily fooled. My question is, what did Darwin contribute to applied science? ... as opposed to useless theorising.
  22. Dredge

    Atheists: Is Murder Acceptable With You?

    I think he meant that life cannot have Righteous meaning.. It can have "Meaning", but if the Authority of our Creator is removed from the equation, that "Meaning" is COMPLETELY subjective.. To some people, that which gives their lives "meaning" might be to go around in gangs like the Mara Salvatrucha 13 who enjoy murdering, torturing, child prostitution, drug traffiking, kidnapping, and anything else that floats their boat.. And if the current "War on Police" continues, many cops might start deciding it is too risky politically to confron these gangs.. And you are left with nothing.. Because as an Atheist, you have ABANDONED the right to claim the moral high ground as your opinion of what is "Meaningful" is just your opinion which has ZERO Authority behind it as you have removed the Author of Life itself from our Society... You can no longer tell people what they should consider "Right" or what is "Wrong" It is called Moral Anarchy.. And we are living that today... How else do you think that it is "Legal" to torture and murder innocent, defenseless human beings for Convenience? I meant Convenience with "MEANING" Sorry... Yes.. Life has meaning... Sure it does.. Most humans beings need to believe that their lives have meaning and purpose. Atheists are no exception; and they will vehmently insist that their lives are meaningful - while at the same time vehmently insisting that life is the result of mindless evolution, and that when they die they go from being an organised collection of atoms to a disorganised collection of atoms. But evolution also implies that rational thinking is optional.
  23. Dredge

    Atheists: Is Murder Acceptable With You?

    Please demonstrate that it cannot have meaning. If not you're presenting a bare assessment fallacy.This is a tough assignment! But in the meantime, I'll say this: I think how life "ends" is more important than how it starts. By that I mean, only immortality can begin to give life purpose and meaning, imo.
  24. Dredge

    Atheists: Is Murder Acceptable With You?

    According to evolution, humans are just accidents of nature and are no more important than rocks; in fact, humans don't even need to exist. So genocide is neither moral nor immoral; it's just irrelevant. If it is not immoral to kill 6 million bacteria, why should it be immoral to kill 6 million humans? How can an atheist prove that - contrary to what "science" implies - the life of a human is worth more than the life of a bacterium?
  25. Dredge

    Atheists: Is Murder Acceptable With You?

    When it comes to abiogenesis, atheists rely on a form of circular reasoning that trumps all other reasoning: Life exists, therefore It is a fact that inanimate matter must have given rise to the first simple life form. The scientific impossibility of it happening is not a concern.
×

Important Information

Our Terms