Jump to content
Evolution Fairytale Forum

Perpetual_student

Veteran Member
  • Content Count

    337
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by Perpetual_student

  1. Perpetual_student

    A New Look at the Fossil Record

    That doesn't matter in this discussion. The premisse of a different past was made in the OP, the burden of proof lies thus in providing evidence for this different past.
  2. Perpetual_student

    A New Look at the Fossil Record

    No, I didn't make such a premise. The premise of a different past was made in the OP, that's a positive claim, the burden of proof lies with the OP.
  3. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    Todd Wood said (and is quoted in your post) "for example". There are many more example than only d-Darwin's finches. The finches are just an easy, well known example out of many.
  4. Perpetual_student

    A New Look at the Fossil Record

    Correct. Baseless assertion. "If", but this post doesn't give any reason to expect or accept such a thing. So either there comes evidence for such rapid decay, or the condition mentioned doesn't apply. But it doesn't mean we were alive either. And if it wasn't, then the argument of this post falls flat. Nope, that conclusion does not derive from until now unproven) premisse. It does matter why (or rather "how"). This posts rests on an unproven premisse that the nature of the past was somehow "different" (unspecified) and derives a conclusion (trilobites, dinosaurs and humans lived together) that does not logically follows. And looking at the Quran, there was a winged horse. Which still is.
  5. Perpetual_student

    Morality Under God Or Atheism

    So, you are going to use your newly acquired mod powers to retaliate against those who show you are wrong. That's very christian and very brave.
  6. Perpetual_student

    Morality Under God Or Atheism

    In my case, some people here have pushed me even further away from christianity.
  7. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    oh? OK, i'm holding my breath... Oh, they read what you write and I don't? How is then going through your writings, phrase by phrase, sometimes one word at a time not reading? Let's wait and see... That Martin Fourcade waas a biathlete, which is not so much https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Fourcade I hope the second part will be more informative... So you haven't stated yet? How disappointing. That wasn't much. Well done. Congratulations.
  8. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    Hi Mike, Two times you mention me, and twice you misrepresent my objections to your writings. I don't object you using " a lot of words". What object -- and mention clearly is that you write very long texts to hide the fact that you have no argument. You use your words as a smoke screen, not for clarification. Iw rite so clearly in my rebuttal to you. The fact that you misrepresent my position as just "hating a lot of words" is a non truth. It's even spelled out in the post you quote. And you do that often, creating smoke screens: You did this here, for example https://evolutionfairytale.com/forum/index.php?/topic/6917-the-bible-predicts/&do=findComment&comment=150730 or here https://evolutionfairytale.com/forum/index.php?/topic/6917-the-bible-predicts/&do=findComment&comment=150723 or here https://evolutionfairytale.com/forum/index.php?/topic/6890-the-pendleton-curve/&do=findComment&comment=147528
  9. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    the exact same thing can be said of transitionals between animal phyla. none has never been found, and never will. apparently life was absent then was "just there" in all its shining glory. That's actually a good point. Especially since it's an agnostic stating it rather than an, "irate religious fundamentalist". Of course on EvC forum the evolutionists' answer to, "What If"s existence is that he is a creationist in disguise, believe it or not. (for they sometimes read these forums) So that's good logic, "what If" because the same could be argued for transitionals. However Wibble's famous, "bunny in the cambrian" argument is basically just an ad nauseam P.R.A.T.T which means, "point refuted a thousand times". He repeats it endlessly, the tactic with this fallacy is that by endless repetition people will believe something to be true because of how many times it is stated. False. It has never been refuted. The simple fact is that you need to produce such a fossil and that you don't. You produce a lot of words, but that's your usual smoke screen. If you had found such out of place fossil you would show. The rest of Mike"s post is this, a lot of words, no fossil. That's the essence. But Mike's answer isn't even internally consistent. i will answer parts of it. It's not rhetoric, Mike, it's an easy way to falsify the ToE The simple fact is that YOU produce a lot of rhetoric. Can someone be more inconsistent? In this very short passage the Cambrian is an era of time passed a type of rock rocks laid down at the same time as others So no Mike it is just an era. Nothing else. We know that certain rocks were formed during that era, but the rocks aren't the era. Also, Mike doesn't argue that it is an era of time passed to then state the opposite: all rocks were formed at the same time. The history as described by different sciences, (geology, paleontology etc) are not assumptions, but conclusions after doing research. So another thing you're wrong about. Qualifying this as an assumption is just rhetoric. So period is now in quote marks. Note that Mike wasn't going to argue that the Cambrian is an era of time passed, yet sneakily puts it in quote marks and labels it as a marine environment. So the Cambrian era is an era of time passed a type of rock rocks laid down at the same time as others a marine environment In this passage Mike assumes without any justification a pre-flood and a flood. But of course, through handy rhetoric evolutionary history is just assumptions while his assumptions will become facts. One would also assume that Mike can read a full sentence All you need is that one rabbit in the Cambrian (or one of many thousands of equivalents) and its game over for evolution. But none has ever been found (and never will). The many thousand other examples were overlooked by Mike. And a fourteen year old girl using google would at least have a big advantage over Mike; a relation with the real world. More later.
  10. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    the exact same thing can be said of transitionals between animal phyla. none has never been found, and never will. apparently life was absent then was "just there" in all its shining glory. That's actually a good point. Especially since it's an agnostic stating it rather than an, "irate religious fundamentalist". Of course on EvC forum the evolutionists' answer to, "What If"s existence is that he is a creationist in disguise, believe it or not. (for they sometimes read these forums) You do this very often. Complain about the behavior of the people of the EvC forum. You even opened an entire thread for it. Yet you never provide an example or link to such behavior. https://evolutionfairytale.com/forum/index.php?/topic/6901-evolutionist-help-mike-the-bully/
  11. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    I have studied it.. More than you have I'm sure.. That's the problem.. The more one studies it WITH OPEN EYES, the more apparent it becomes that the whole fairytale of Evolutionism is a hoax on steroids that even YOU can't support with scientific evidence... Good, fine excellent. So any falsehood you write from now on will not be treated as an error or ignorance, but as a willful falsehood.
  12. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    Do you agree with this part? By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record. 
  13. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    Blitzking, since you like quotes so much, here is another one By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record. Of primary importance is the fact that evidence is always subject to interpretation by fallible people who do not possess all information. And you know what I do link to the direct original source; https://answersingenesis.org/about/faith/
  14. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    You have studied it? Good. Tell us then what empirical evidence convinced you that the ToE is wrong. And I'm asking you for evidence. Not a silly quote, no cartoon. Evidence. What evidence convinced you?
  15. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    HKW ABOUT THESE PEOPLE....? ACCORDING TO YOU, THEY MUST HAVE A "POOR UNDERSTANDING OF EVOLUTION" AS WELL AS NEEDING TO "STUDY" SO THEY CAN "KNOW WHAT THEY ARE ARGUING AGAINST" ISNT THAT RIGHT, BECAUSE, AFTER ALL, THEY DONT BELIEVE THAT EVOLUTIONISM IS TRUE BECAUSE THEY DONT HAVE AS MUCH KNOWLEDGE ON THE SUBJECT AS YOU DO RIGHT? "In conclusion, evolution is not observable, repeatable, or refutable, and thus does not qualify as either a scientific fact or theory." (Dr. David N. Menton, PhD in Biology from Brown University) "I think in fifty years, Darwinian evolution will be gone from the science curriculum...I think people will look back on it and ask how anyone could, in their right mind, have believed this, because it's so implausible when you look at the evidence." (Dr. Johnathan Wells molecular biologist, author of the book, "Icons of Evolution") Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups." (Dr. Duane Gish, Biochemist.) "Evolution is a fairy tale for adults." (Dr. Paul LeMoine, one of the most prestigious scientists in the world) "Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." (Prof. Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, National Center of Scientific Research.) "The evolution theory is purely the product of the imagination." (Dr. Ambrose Flemming, Pres. Philosophical Society of Great Britain) "The Darwinian theory of descent has not a single fact to confirm it in the realm of nature. It is not the result of scientific research but purely the product of the imagination." (Albert Fleishman, professor of zoology & comparative anatomy at Erlangen University) "We have had enough of the Darwinian fallacy. It is time we cry, "The emperor has no clothes." (Dr. Hsu, geologist at the Geological Institute in Zurich.) "The great cosmologic myth of the twentieth century." (Dr. Michael Denton, molecular biochemist, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis.) "The miracles required to make evolution feasible are far greater in number and far harder to believe than the miracle of creation." (Dr. Richard Bliss, former professor of biology and science education) "My attempts to demonstrate evolution by an experiment carried on for more than 40 years have completely failed.....It is not even possible to make a caricature of an evolution out of paleobiological facts...The idea of an evolution rests on pure belief." (Dr. Nils Heribert-Nilsson, noted Swedish botanist and geneticist, of Lund University) "I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science. When this happens, many people will pose the question, "How did this ever happen?" (Dr. Sorren Luthrip, Swedish Embryologist) "Darwin's theory of evolution is the last of the great nineteenth-century mystery religions. And as we speak it is now following Freudians and Marxism into the Nether regions, and I'm quite sure that Freud, Marx and Darwin are commiserating one with the other in the dark dungeon where discarded gods gather." (Dr. David Berlinski) "The theory [of evolution] is a scientific mistake." (Dr. Louis Agassiz, Harvard University professor and the pioneer in glaciation.] "The success of Darwinism was accomplished by a decline in scientific integrity." (Dr. W.R. Thompson, world renowned Entomologist) "I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially to the extant that it's been applied, will be one of the greatest jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so flimsy and dubious a hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity that it has." (Malcolm Muggeridge) I GUESS THEY JUST NEEDED MORE STUDY LIKE YOU HAVE.. HKW ABOUT THESE PEOPLE....? ACCORDING TO YOU, THEY MUST HAVE A "POOR UNDERSTANDING OF EVOLUTION" AS WELL AS NEEDING TO "STUDY" SO THEY CAN "KNOW WHAT THEY ARE ARGUING AGAINST" ISNT THAT RIGHT, BECAUSE, AFTER ALL, THEY DONT BELIEVE THAT EVOLUTIONISM IS TRUE BECAUSE THEY DONT HAVE AS MUCH KNOWLEDGE ON THE SUBJECT AS YOU DO RIGHT? You are not Dr. David N. Menton, Dr. Johnathan Wells, Dr. Duane Gish, or any other of these people. You still need to study the ToE if you want to argue against it.
  16. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    The red part is an ad hominem fallacy Green; facts aren't your strong suit.
  17. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    Which is exactly an argument from authority! The burden of proof lies with you. The burden of proof lies with you.
  18. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    1) argument from authority 2) lack of references to check the validity of these quotes 3) probably quote mines if not outright fabrications.
  19. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    another thing is, the processes you named above happen within a single generation, they do not require "millions of years". You need to keep in mind what I was responding to. I pointed out to Blitzking that evolution works through natural means, not supernatural. I didn't mention any timeframe. You reaction is thus beside the point I made.
  20. Perpetual_student

    My I.D Syllogism

    Science must have missed the memo then. A quick search on www.Siencedaily.com gave enough articles that link both https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151121105802.htm https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/04/040415012031.htm https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/03/190305083630.htm
  21. Perpetual_student

    climate change denial

    "relegated to the dustbin of history" was a phrase coined by Lenin when de Bolsheviks removed the more moderate Mensheviks from the Duma...
  22. Perpetual_student

    climate change denial

    Are you suggesting that I caste stones at the USA for their climate policy?
  23. Perpetual_student

    climate change denial

    Except for that tiny little detail that I didn't. The only thing I pointed out was 1) you never linked to the petition, but to an opinion article with 1 author (Alexander Light) and to a pinterest page 2) the opinion page contains gross errors against very basic chemistry. Which at no point was an argument from authority, as you falsely write. While I pointed out the factual error (vapor pressure only applies for a substance in equilibrium with it's condensed phase) your counterargument was Which is still an argument from authority. From this 1) you never addressed the core of my argument (the science!) 2) used an argument from authority 3) now pretend that I use an argument from authority while using it three times yourself Matthew 7:3-5 King James Version (KJV) 3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
  24. Perpetual_student

    climate change denial

    Argument from authority, used by Blitzking; https://evolutionfairytale.com/forum/index.php?/topic/6927-climate-change-denial/&do=findComment&comment=153583 Argument from authority, used by Blitzking and a distortion of the post he was responding to. https://evolutionfairytale.com/forum/index.php?/topic/6927-climate-change-denial/&do=findComment&comment=153652 Argument from authority, used by Blitzking; https://evolutionfairytale.com/forum/index.php?/topic/6927-climate-change-denial/&do=findComment&comment=153656
  25. Perpetual_student

    climate change denial

    Except for that tiny little detail that I never cited that figure or used that as an argument.
×

Important Information

Our Terms