Jump to content
Evolution Fairytale Forum


Veteran Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

About Ron

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender

Previous Fields

  • What is your Gender?
  • How old are you?
  • What is your affiliation/religion?
  • What is your Worldview?
  • Where do you live (i.e. Denver, Colorado)
    Johnstown, PA

Recent Profile Visitors

458 profile views
  1. I Just went back a checked one more time Gilbo, and you are incorrect. Calminian (not Sammy) indeed posted at least one comment per link, whereas Mars had wholesale copy-n-paste links. Further, it is inappropriate to complain about moderator actions on the open forum. Once again, a cursory reading of the forum rules would reveal the incorrect application above.
  2. I read through all the posts Mars; each and every one of them. And I read through the links YOU BOTH posted. And had YOU framed your arguments FOR EACH AND EVERY LINK with at least a modicum of understanding (as Calminian did for his), AND had you read the rules (as I suggested), we wouldn’t be having this conversation, because YOU would have known that you weren’t be chastised FOR your argument, but rather the LACK THERE OF. And at this point, you are not only using “Ad hominem attacks” against me, but you are “Complaining about board moderation” as well. Once again, YOU need to read the forum rules prior to coming here and misrepresenting what is going on.
  3. Could you please be specific as to what you do not agree with? I will then provide why I took that point and based on which sources I deemed accurate. I would like to direct your attention to the following websites that will shed more light on tektonics.org and Robert Turkel. http://www.theskepticalreview.com/tsrmag/024jph.html http://the-anointed-one.com/exintro.html Looking forward to hear what you disagree with. Could you please tell me where I can find the sources for Robert Turkel's opinions. After having read through Calminian’s rebuttal of your post, and your answer post, one thing gleans true; Calminian provided links and a brief description on his half of the argument; and you simply posted two links of Argumentum ad Hominem (abusive) by another individual (i.e. NOT YOU), then required Calminian to respond to those ad Hominem attacks. First – Simply posting links is against forum rules! Second - ad Hominem attacks are against the forum rules! Conclusion – Neither are conducive to “honest, educational, civil, and fun debate on the topic of origins”. You may want to re-read those forum rules (the one’s you agreed to abide by when being accepted to be a member of this forum).
  4. Have we not had innumerable conversations, and warnings about simply posting a link as your argument? Mars, read the forum rules about posting links, sans dialogue on your part, in description of said links.
  5. Exactly Reptoman. The consistent, measurable presence of C14 in dinosaur tissue and bones blows the millions of years ago scenario right out of the water. Of course, but our evolutionary friends will use a prevarication, convoluted rhetoric, or historical revisionism to side-step that issue as well. Where it really gets sticky (no pun intended) is in the soft tissue remains. You already know the answer to that, and yet the dancing always starts the “Evo” conversation. But, this statement from the link just makes me smirk: "As with most scientific dating schemes certain assumptions must be made for the method to be useful."
  6. Ron

    Only Questions...

    Why; wouldn't that be Mark Hovekane???
  7. Ron

    Burden Of Proof

    That is a fact!
  8. Ron

    The Religion Of Evolution

    Ahhh, but that is a common evolutionists tactic; Claim it proves evolution, and "Wah-Lah" it proves evolution. And by evolution, they mean "MACRO" evolution of course.
  9. Ron

    Christianity's Place In The Universe

    Actually, the "Moring Star" is Jesus (amongst other names): "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star." ~ Revelation 22:16 Isaiah 14:12 and the contextual verbiage around it, was speaking of the "Fall of Satan" , not the Morning Star.
  10. Ron

    Only Questions...

  11. Ron

    Evolution Did It

    Well, since yu didn't answer it when I asked before (See posts 105 and 110). When you say "Long Term evolution" are you reffering to "Macroevolution"? And if so, are you saying that "Macroevolution" is a fact? Please give a "Yes" or "No" answer, then an explanation (if you wish to give an explanation).
  12. Ron

    First Warning

    You're welcome, although it was just a brief encapsulation, and is not all-inclusive, it should be sufficient for the purposes.
  13. Ron

    First Warning

    If you take the time to read the forum rules, you’ll notice the following statement: “The primary goal of this forum is to provide a place for honest, educational, civil, and fun debate on the topic of origins. Given the heated nature of the creation vs. evolution debate, this is not an easy goal to achieve so we will require members to follow the stringent set of guidelines below. To make life easier for the moderators, our goal is to weed-out the troublemakers early, which should also lessen interaction from moderators. We want to have as little editing or deleting of posts as possible, so instead we will seek to edit “people” . As it states, the rules are stringent, yet there is latitude as to Banning. The warning system is used more for the moderators and admin, so that we can all view and understand what is going on with members that violate the forum rules. Some members receive no warning at all because of the severity of their violations; and some members are given more latitude because they may just misunderstand (a slight misunderstanding of the rules), or they rarely violate the rules. But sometimes it just boils down to their not taking the time to invest into reading the rules thoroughly. AS far as banning, its usually a corporate decision amongst admin and moderators. As an aside – I pointed out earlier; it doesn’t matter if you are a Christian, Atheist, agnostic, or whatever, if someone is a flaggrant rules violater, or is too abusive, they can be left go. And members of all walks have been banned.
  14. Ron

    Christianity's Place In The Universe

    The only other life forces mentioned in the Bible Would be God (the Trinity: Father, Son, Holy Spirit), Angels (various types) and Demons. Other than that, no…
  15. Ron

    Ontological Argument For God

    Making use of multiple meanings of the same word is "word magic". As it implies a violation of the Law of Identity, it is relevant to the laws of logic, because it is a violation. Fjuri, the word “Magic” in the context of the post is a pejorative against “logic” and/or the “Laws of Logic”. It was a sarcastic attempt to belittle the usage of logic, by GW, simply because he didn’t like the usage. This is simply NOT how honest discussion and civil conversation works. If GW has a problem with the ontological argument, then JUSTIFY the comment with dialogue as to WHY he doesn’t like it. Painting it, the way he did, with the following quote is anathema to dialogue, conversation and debate: Further, what he did, was NOT ‘relevant to the Laws of Logic’, it was simply a slanderous and spurious comment ABOUT the logic.

Important Information

Our Terms