Jump to content
Evolution Fairytale Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Earthling

Fresh Meat...

Recommended Posts

Based on the number of banned non-creationist users on this forum (and the rather... let's see, how can I put this mildly... interesting way some discussion topics (e.g. evolution) are framed in the Forum Rules and FAQ), my guess is that I won't stay long here. Especially since I am forced to choose a 'worldview' (in my case a non-creationist one), even though I would have preferred to keep that private since I feel that such enforced labels probably detract from what should (at least in my opinion) be most important, i.e. the arguments that are actually presented. But anyway, hi all!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Earthling. I wanted to include an appropriate smiley, so here's one for you: :fly: LOL!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on the number of banned non-creationist users on this forum (and the rather... let's see, how can I put this mildly... interesting way some discussion topics (e.g. evolution) are framed in the Forum Rules and FAQ), my guess is that I won't stay long here. Especially since I am forced to choose a 'worldview' (in my case a non-creationist one), even though I would have preferred to keep that private since I feel that such enforced labels probably detract from what should (at least in my opinion) be most important, i.e. the arguments that are actually presented. But anyway, hi all!

 

If you cannot put up front what you believe and defend it then to what end do you hide it? No worldview or a neutral one allows you to play the whole table while never committing to anything if it does not apply. Would you want to debate a Christian that would not tell you what they believe and debated you to the point you did not know how to respond because you did not know where they were coming from?

 

That's what we try to avoid here. We have even had Christians try to join up as evolutionists to play games and guess what? They got banned as well. Either you are serious about debating the subject or you are here to waste everyone's time. So which would you say you are here for?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what we try to avoid here. We have even had Christians try to join up as evolutionists to play games and guess what? They got banned as well.

You mean they were actually creationists and lied about their worldview?

 

I wonder how many people have changed their worldview while a member of this forum. I know two that have! :Just_Cuz:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you cannot put up front what you believe and defend it then to what end do you hide it?

If I have to defend something, does that mean that I will be attacked? Because I read the forum rules and they say "The primary goal of this forum is to provide a place for honest, educational, civil, and fun debate on the topic of origins." Attacks on my atheism are not part of that, as far as I am concerned. I am happy to discuss it, though, if you feel the need for that. But if you, as administrator of a debate forum, cannot accept that some people hold views different from yours and want to "attack" them, then this is indeed not the place for me and my stay here will be accordingly short. So, in line with the forum rules that ask for civility and fun, let me extend my hello to you as well. It is nice to meet one of the administrators, even though it would be nicer if they had said hello and welcomed me to the forum, like MamaElephant kindly did, before they go off and lecture me.

 

PS, and as for this one,

Would you want to debate a Christian that would not tell you what they believe and debated you to the point you did not know how to respond because you did not know where they were coming from?

When I debate someone I don't care or need to know whether someone is a believer or not. I care about whether their arguments are valid or not. If an argument is invalid or illogical it is so irrespective of someone's belief or lack thereof. And that is why I would prefer to hide my so-called 'worldview'. Because it doesn't matter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice sig line. I would suggest The Top 10 Myths about Evolution. I have seen evolutionists use arguments based on these myths a lot. :) I learned a lot from reading the book too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I made a sig line but I actually can't see it in my posts, not even if I log out. Can I change that in some way? (still trying to figure out how the forum software works)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I have to defend something, does that mean that I will be attacked? Because I read the forum rules and they say "The primary goal of this forum is to provide a place for honest, educational, civil, and fun debate on the topic of origins." Attacks on my atheism are not part of that, as far as I am concerned. I am happy to discuss it, though, if you feel the need for that. But if you, as administrator of a debate forum, cannot accept that some people hold views different from yours and want to "attack" them, then this is indeed not the place for me and my stay here will be accordingly short. So, in line with the forum rules that ask for civility and fun, let me extend my hello to you as well. It is nice to meet one of the administrators, even though it would be nicer if they had said hello and welcomed me to the forum, like MamaElephant kindly did, before they go off and lecture me.

 

PS, and as for this one,

 

When I debate someone I don't care or need to know whether someone is a believer or not. I care about whether their arguments are valid or not. If an argument is invalid or illogical it is so irrespective of someone's belief or lack thereof. And that is why I would prefer to hide my so-called 'worldview'. Because it doesn't matter.

 

We were lectured first so I returned the favor. If you are going to have a problem with the forum and knew this why did you join? Accusing everyone else of everything that you foresee as going to go wrong because you believe we are the problem and not you, only shows us that you think you should be able to tell us how to run a forum that you don;t pay the bills for.

 

If all you are going to do is complain and waste everyone's time, I can fix that and it would not even bother me. Whine if you must but tolerance of it won't last much longer.

 

Your thread name and subject tells me that you want to be banned. And that you are mad you cannot hide behind a neutral worldview. Following rules on forums that are run by people you despise must really be a problem for you. Well you agreed to them when you joined. So it's not our fault when you get banned for breaking the disagreement.

 

Posted Image

 

Posted Image

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the thread name was a bit cheeky too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I have to defend something, does that mean that I will be attacked? Because I read the forum rules and they say "The primary goal of this forum is to provide a place for honest, educational, civil, and fun debate on the topic of origins." Attacks on my atheism are not part of that, as far as I am concerned. I am happy to discuss it, though, if you feel the need for that. But if you, as administrator of a debate forum, cannot accept that some people hold views different from yours and want to "attack" them, then this is indeed not the place for me and my stay here will be accordingly short. So, in line with the forum rules that ask for civility and fun, let me extend my hello to you as well. It is nice to meet one of the administrators, even though it would be nicer if they had said hello and welcomed me to the forum, like MamaElephant kindly did, before they go off and lecture me. PS, and as for this one, When I debate someone I don't care or need to know whether someone is a believer or not. I care about whether their arguments are valid or not. If an argument is invalid or illogical it is so irrespective of someone's belief or lack thereof. And that is why I would prefer to hide my so-called 'worldview'. Because it doesn't matter.

Sawadee krap Earthling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I have to defend something, does that mean that I will be attacked? Because I read the forum rules and they say "The primary goal of this forum is to provide a place for honest, educational, civil, and fun debate on the topic of origins." Attacks on my atheism are not part of that, as far as I am concerned. I am happy to discuss it, though, if you feel the need for that. But if you, as administrator of a debate forum, cannot accept that some people hold views different from yours and want to "attack" them, then this is indeed not the place for me and my stay here will be accordingly short. So, in line with the forum rules that ask for civility and fun, let me extend my hello to you as well. It is nice to meet one of the administrators, even though it would be nicer if they had said hello and welcomed me to the forum, like MamaElephant kindly did, before they go off and lecture me.

 

PS, and as for this one,

 

When I debate someone I don't care or need to know whether someone is a believer or not. I care about whether their arguments are valid or not. If an argument is invalid or illogical it is so irrespective of someone's belief or lack thereof. And that is why I would prefer to hide my so-called 'worldview'. Because it doesn't matter.

 

Yes when you inevitably come to a rational, logical discussion about your worldview, you will be forced to "defend" it with rational arguments. Is this a problem?

 

If you don't show your worldview, what purpose would this serve?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We were lectured first so I returned the favor.

Obviously.

 

Following rules on forums that are run by people you despise must really be a problem for you.

First, I don't have a problem with following rules, if they make sense. Second, I did follow the rules, since I am here. Third, I made an observation on how many non-creationists get banned here (a lot), and on how you frame any discussions on evolution (in an interesting way). If making such observations is not allowed here, let me know. Fourth, I do not despise you. Why should I? I don't even know you. Unless you want me to despise you...

 

So it's not our fault when you get banned for breaking the disagreement.

I have included my 'worldview' so as far I know I have not broken any 'agreement' there. I just pointed out that in a discussion about evolution, 'worldview' doesn't matter. Arguments and evidence do. So it would be nice if we can turn to that, instead of quibbling over some observations that I made, don't you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes when you inevitably come to a rational, logical discussion about your worldview, you will be forced to "defend" it with rational arguments. Is this a problem?

Certainly not. But I thought this site was about discussing evolution, not 'worldviews'. Am I wrong there?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought the thread name was a bit cheeky too

 

Maybe it is, but then again, big red warnings aimed at evolutionists only when you sign up, and the staggering number of banned atheists at this forum do not really make you feel welcome, and certainly do not give the impression that moderation here is going to treat creationists and non-creationists alike... So I thought, I make a tongue-in-cheek reference to that. Unless criticism is not allowed here. In that case, let me know. Anyway, I am happy to turn to some real topics. Science and stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly not. But I thought this site was about discussing evolution, not 'worldviews'. Am I wrong there?

 

Hi Earthling and welcome!

 

Actually, I think you will find that it is the "wordview" part of evolution that is being discussed here. Creationists don't disagree with the scientific, observable side of evolution, since we see it as adaption within populations of a certain kind of animal. Both creationists and evoutionists recognize that life on earth exist in tree structures, with the bottom part of the trees hidden by time. Evolutionists see all the trees merging whereas creationists see a boundary between trees that is not being crossed and consider the evidence of this boundary-crossing to be way to skimpish to be called science.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe it is, but then again, big red warnings aimed at evolutionists only when you sign up, and the staggering number of banned atheists at this forum do not really make you feel welcome, and certainly do not give the impression that moderation here is going to treat creationists and non-creationists alike... So I thought, I make a tongue-in-cheek reference to that. Unless criticism is not allowed here. In that case, let me know. Anyway, I am happy to turn to some real topics. Science and stuff.

 

I understand your concern, but I think you have to envision this from a creationist perspective. If you were to submit a few pro-creationist posts out on an unmodified forum such as YouTube then you would soon discover how many bannable offences per post there are. Although most of the atheists and evolutionist who come here do not resort to open insults and so on, a very large number of them still house a great deal of contempt and I think inevitably this causes problems here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@UppsalaDragby,

Sure, there is a lot of sometimes unnecessary name-calling in this debate. However, I feel that by putting up the kind of quite negatively phrased, up front warnings that this forum has, you are more likely to scare off the 'friendly' evolutionists (not necessarily only atheists, since there are many religious evolutionists) who want to debate in an open atmosphere then people who just want to make fun of you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly not. But I thought this site was about discussing evolution, not 'worldviews'. Am I wrong there?

 

Evolutionisim IS a worldview; especially where it touches on macroevolution and the attempts to dogmatically defend it as a fact.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evolutionisim IS a worldview

If 'evolutionism' is a 'worldview', then why wasn't it in the list from worldviews from which I was forced to choose when I signed up to this forum? Or do you mean that 'evolutionism' is the same as atheism?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on the number of banned non-creationist users on this forum (and the rather... let's see, how can I put this mildly... interesting way some discussion topics (e.g. evolution) are framed in the Forum Rules and FAQ), my guess is that I won't stay long here. Especially since I am forced to choose a 'worldview' (in my case a non-creationist one), even though I would have preferred to keep that private since I feel that such enforced labels probably detract from what should (at least in my opinion) be most important, i.e. the arguments that are actually presented. But anyway, hi all!

 

 

 

Firstly - There are a number of Creationist on this forum that were banned as well, so to attempt the false accusation of correlation of non-creationist = banning is a red herring.

 

Secondly - The reason ANYONE (Creationist and Non-creationist alike) get banned, is because they continually fail to follow the rules of this forum. There rules are agreed to prior to ANYONE being accepted to participate in this forum.

 

Thirdly - Your argument fails on the fact that YOU agreed to these rules prior to YOUR being accepted to participate in this forum as well. Therefore you are NOW complaining about those rules of this forum, that you agreed to prior to being accepted to participate in this forum.

 

Fourthly - We ALL post our world view so as to insure that we are honest in our conversations. This keeps those of nefarious intent, from posting under a false worldview, and being dishonestly contrary in order to cause conflict in the discourse of others.

 

Lastly - If your argument cannot be sustained with logical, rational AND scientific fact (and not mere opinion), you'll find that it doesn't matter which worldview you espouse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly not. But I thought this site was about discussing evolution, not 'worldviews'. Am I wrong there?

Evolutionism IS a worldview

If 'evolutionism' is a 'worldview', then why wasn't it in the list from worldviews from which I was forced to choose when I signed up to this forum? Or do you mean that 'evolutionism' is the same as atheism?

 

 

Because evolutionism is a worldview subset shared by Atheists, Agnostics, and theistic-evolutionists (etc...)

But it IS a worldview nonetheless.

 

The bigger question is this: Are you claiming NOT to be an atheist?

If no, I can see why you are having trouble. If you are, I would wonder why you would wish to conceal being an atheist.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe it is, but then again, big red warnings aimed at evolutionists only when you sign up, and the staggering number of banned atheists at this forum do not really make you feel welcome, and certainly do not give the impression that moderation here is going to treat creationists and non-creationists alike... So I thought, I make a tongue-in-cheek reference to that. Unless criticism is not allowed here. In that case, let me know. Anyway, I am happy to turn to some real topics. Science and stuff.

 

Yes whilst it isn't a good impression, when you consider that stuff that can (and sometimes does) happen, the warning does have a reason.

 

Many of the atheists get banned here from their own behaviour... Refusing to give evidence when asked, refusing to support their claims, making unsupported claims as if they were fact, equivocation, time wasting / trolling, ad hominems, etc etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Evolutionism is the acceptance of this:

"The diversity of life on Earth is the outcome of evolution: an unsupervised, impersonal, unpredictable and natural process of temporal descent with genetic modification that is affected by natural selection, chance, historical contingencies and changing environments."

 

(Definition from the National Association of Biology Teachers)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If 'evolutionism' is a 'worldview', then why wasn't it in the list from worldviews from which I was forced to choose when I signed up to this forum? Or do you mean that 'evolutionism' is the same as atheism?

 

I think I saw "Thesistic Evolutionist" as a worldview. I know people who are Christians that think evolution is OK and not conflict with their religion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

Our Terms